ObjectiveTo investigate predictive value of amylase level in intraperitoneal drainage fluid after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for grade B and C pancreatic fistula (PF).MethodThe clinical data of 106 patients underwent PD in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from June 2014 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsTwenty-four cases (22.6%) had the PF after the PD, in which of 18 cases of grade A, 4 cases of grade B, and 2 cases of grade C. The age, tumor diameter, pancreatic texture, and main pancreatic duct diameter were associated with the PF after the PD by the univariate analysis (P<0.050), the main pancreatic duct diameter (OR=4.856, P=0.004) was its independent risk factor. The amylase levels of intraperitoneal drainage fluid on day 5, 7, and 10 after the PD could better predict the occurrence of PF (AUC was 0.910, 0.951, 0.948, respectively), especially which on day 10 after the PD could better predict the occurrence of grade B and C PF (AUC was 0.938).ConclusionElevated amylase levels in peritoneal drainage fluid on day 5, 7, and 10 after PD have better diagnostic effects on PF, especially which on day 10 after PD has a better diagnostic effect on grade B and C PF.
ObjectiveTo review the recent research progress on prediction models for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy and explore the potential application of prediction models in personalized treatment, aiming to provide useful reference information for clinical doctors to improve patient’s treatment outcomes and quality of life. MethodWe systematically searched and reviewed the literature on various prediction models for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy in recent years domestically and internationally. ResultsSpecifically, the fistula risk score (FRS) and the alternative FRS (a-FRS), as widely used tools, possessed a certain degree of subjectivity due to the lack of an objective evaluation standard for pancreatic texture. The updated a-FRS (ua-FRS) had demonstrated superior predictive efficacy in minimally invasive surgery compared to the original FRS and a-FRS. The NCCH (National Cancer Center Hospital) prediction system, based on preoperative indicators, showed high predictive accuracy. Prediction models based on CT imaging informatics had improved the accuracy and reliability of predictions. Prediction models based on elastography had provided new perspectives for the assessment of pancreatic texture and the prediction of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. The Stacking ensemble machine learning model contributed to the individualization and localization of prediction models. The existing pancreatic fistula prediction models showed satisfactory predictive efficacy, but there were still limitations in identifying high-risk patients for pancreatic fistula.ConclusionsAfter pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic fistula remains a major complication that is difficult to overcome. The prevention of pancreatic fistula is crucial for improving postoperative recovery and reducing mortality rates. Future research should focus on the development and validation of pancreatic fistula prediction models, thereby enhancing their predictive power and increasing their predictive efficacy in different regional patients, providing a scientific basis for medical decision-making.
ObjectiveTo investigate value of drainage fluid amylase content and other risk factors in predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).MethodsThe clinical data of 166 patients who underwent LPD in this hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The independent risk factors of CR-POPF after LPD were analyzed. And the sensitivity and specificity of drainage fluid amylase content obtained on postoperative day 1 and 3 (Abbreviated as DFA1 and DFA3, respectively) in predicting CR-POPF by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.ResultsA total of 166 patients underwent LPD were collected in this study. The CR-POPF occurred in 16 (9.6%) patients and all of them were grade B. The DFA1 (P=0.037), DFA3 (P<0.001), and positive bacterial culture of drainage fluid after operation (P=0.020) were the independent risk factors of CR-POPF after LPD (P<0.05) by the logistic regression multivariate analysis. The area under the ROC curve of the DFA1 and DFA3 in predicting CR-POPF was 0.880 [95%CI (0.812, 0.949)] and 0.912 [95%CI (0.853, 0.971)] respectively, and the corresponding best critical value was 3 925 and 939 U/L, and the sensitivity was 100% and 100%, specificity was 64.0% and 70.7%, respectively.ConclusionFor patients with DFA1>3 925 U/L, DFA3>939 U/L, and positive bacterial culture of drainage fluid after operation, preventive measures should be made to avoid CR-POPF.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current status and update of the use of medical imaging in risk prediction of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).MethodA systematic review was performed based on recent literatures regarding the radiological risk factors and risk prediction of pancreatic fistula following PD.ResultsThe risk prediction of pancreatic fistula following PD included preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative aspects. Visceral obesity was the independent risk factor for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). Radiographically determined sarcopenia had no significant predictive value on CR-POPF. Smaller pancreatic duct diameter and softer pancreatic texture were associated with higher incidence of pancreatic fistula. Besides the surgeons’ subjective intraoperative perception, quantitative assessment of the pancreatic texture based on medical imaging had been reported as well. In addition, the postoperative laboratory results such as drain amylase and serum lipase level on postoperative day 1 could also be used for the evaluation of the risk of pancreatic fistula.ConclusionsRisk prediction of pancreatic fistula following PD has considerable clinical significance, it leads to early identification and early intervention of the risk factors for pancreatic fistula. Medical imaging plays an important role in this field. Results from relevant studies could be used to optimize individualized perioperative management of patients undergoing PD.
Objective To investigate the effect of sarcopenia on postoperative complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy（PD）. Methods The data of 225 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing First Hospital) from March 2012 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The total area of the skeletal muscle was measured by CT images at the level of the third lumbar vertebra for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. The patients were divided into sarcopenia group and non-sarcopenia group. The clinical data and surgical complications were compared between the two groups to explore the relationship between sarcopenia and postoperative complications. Results Compared with the non-sarcopenia group, the patients in the sarcopenia group were older and had lower hemoglobin concentration, lower serum albumin concentration, and higher total bilirubin levels (P<0.05). The incidences of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B and C fistula), pulmonary infection, atelectasis and hypoxemia in the sarcopenia group were significantly higher than those in the non-sarcopenia group (P<0.05). The length of ICU stay and perioperative mortality in the sarcopenia group were significantly higher than those in the non-sarcopenia group (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that sarcopenia, preoperative total bilirubin level, pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic texture were independent risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (P<0.05). Sarcopenia, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative abdominal infection were independent risk factors for pulmonary complications after PD (P<0.05). Conclusions Sarcopenia is an independent risk factor for increased incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula and pulmonary complications after PD. Strengthening perioperative nutritional therapy and rehabilitation exercise in patients with sarcopenia is of great significance to reduce postoperative complications of PD.
Objective To compare anastomotic fistula of modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods The clinical data of 147 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2015 to June 2017 in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively analyzed. The modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 101 cases (MTL group) and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 46 cases (IPJ group). The differences of intraoperative and postoperative statuses were compared between the two groups. Results The baseline data of these two groups had no significant differences (P>0.05). Except for the average time of the pancreaticoenterostomy of the MTL group was significantly longer than that of the IPJ group (P<0.05), the intraoperative blood loss, the first postoperative exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization time, reoperation rate, death rate, and rates of complications such as the pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, anastomotic bleeding, gastric emptying disorder, and intraperitoneal infection had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Both modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy are safe and effective. An individualized selection should be adopted according to specific situation of patient.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (dmPJ) and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy (iPJ) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) on postoperative outcomes. MethodsPubmed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Wanfang and CNKI database were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating different type of pancreaticojejunostomy during PD. The literatures were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessment was conducted according to Jadad scoring system. ResultsNine RCTs were included, 1 032 patients were recruited, including 510 patients in dmPJ group and 522 patients in iPJ group. Meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the incidence of pancreatic fistula in total (OR=0.95, P=0.78), clinical relevant pancreatic fistula (OR=0.78, P=0.71), overall morbidity (OR=0.93, P=0.60), perioperative mortality (OR=0.86, P=0.71), reoperation rate (OR=1.18, P=0.59), and length of hospital stay (WMD=-1.11, P=0.19). ConclusionDmPJ and iPJ are comparable in terms of pancreatic fistula and other complications.
Objective To investigate the effect of the position of pancreatic duct in pancreatic section on postoperative pancreatic fistula. Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy admitted to the pancreatic surgery department of our hospital from September 2018 to August 2020 were retrospectively collected. The consistency between intraoperative pancreatic section data and preoperative CT cross-sectional images of pancreatic duct was compared, and the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model analysis, to determine whether the position of pancreatic duct on pancreatic section during pancreaticojejunostomy had an impact on the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Results A total of 373 patients were included in this study. In 44 cases, the ratio of the thickness of the short distance from the center of the pancreatic duct to the edge of the pancreas at the pancreatic section was 0.41±0.09, and the imaging measurement value was 0.40±0.10. The interclass correlation coefficient detection value of the two measurement methods was 0.916 (>0.75), P<0.001, this had high consistency. Patients had a high BMI [OR=1.276, 95%CI (1.154, 1.411), P<0.000 1] and soft pancreatic texture [OR=2.771, 95%CI (1.558, 4.927), P=0.001] were independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula, while the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula decreased with the increased proportion of pancreatic duct thickness from center to edge [OR=0.875, 95%CI (0.840, 0.911), P<0.000 1]. Conclusions Patients with high BMI and soft pancreas are independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula, and the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula is reduced when the center of pancreatic duct is far from the edge of pancreas. The ratio of short distance from the center of pancreatic duct to the edge of pancreas to the total thickness of pancreas measured by preoperative imaging can be used to evaluate the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Objective To explore the influencing factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and to compare the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with internal drainage of main pancreatic duct and external drainage according to the pancreatic fistula risk score (FRS) system, to provide the basis for the best drainage scheme in clinic. Methods The clinical data of 76 patients with PD who treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2016 to December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively, to explore the risk factors of pancreatic fistula. Single factor analysis was based on group chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method, and multivariate analysis was based on unconditioned logistic regression model. According to the results of FRS, the difference of pancreatic fistula in different risk groups was explored. The statistical method was chi-square test. Results The incidence of pancreatic fistula after PD was 31. 5% in 76 patients.Univariate analysis showed that the diameter of the main pancreatic duct and the texture of the pancreas were the related factors affecting the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after PD (P<0.05), and the soft pancreas was the independent risk factor for the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after PD (OR=3.886, P=0.011). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula between the internal drainage group and the external drainage group (P>0.05). There was no pancreatic fistula occurred in the patients with negligible risk. The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with high risk of external drainage group was only 12.5%, comparing with patients in internal drainage group (63.6%), the difference was statistically significant (P=0.026). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula between patients in the external drainage group with moderate risk and low risk compared with the corresponding patients in the internal drainage group (P>0.05). Conclusions Pancreatic texture was an independent risk factor for pancreatic fistula after PD. External drainage maybe more effective than internal drainage in preventing pancreatic fistula after PD in patients with high risk of FRS.
ObjectiveTo evaluate and synthesize the available experiences related to laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (LDPPHR) in the management of benign pancreatic head lesions. MethodsA retrospective review of the clinical data was conducted for 12 patients who underwent LDPPHR at the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (between January 2020 and December 2024). ResultsAll 12 patients successfully underwent LDPPHR. The surgical duration ranged from 138 to 479 min, with a mean of 336 min. Intraoperative blood loss varied between 40 and 700 mL, averaging 270 mL. The hospital stay varied from 11 to 51 d, with a mean duration of 21.5 d. Notably, none of the 12 patients required blood transfusions during the procedure. Of the 12 patients, 6 were diagnosed with a pancreatic fistula postoperatively, including 5 cases classified as grade A pancreatic fistula, and 1 cases of grade B pancreatic leakage. There were 2 cases of bile leakage and 1 case of gastric emptying disorder. No deaths occurred during the perioperative period. Postoperative pathological examination revealed: chronic pancreatitis witch main pancreatic duct stones in 8 cases, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with low-grade epithelial intraepithelial neoplasia in 3 cases, serous cystadenoma in 1 case. Postoperative follow-up was conducted for 10 patients, with follow-up durations ranging from 6 to 24 months. No recurrence was observed during the follow-up period, and no long-term complications such as diabetes, gastric emptying dysfunction, etc. were reported. ConclusionsLDPPHR offers several benefits, including minimal invasiveness, faster recovery, and enhanced postoperative quality of life for patients. It is safe and feasible for the treatment of benign lesions in the head of the pancreas.