ObjectiveTo understand the impact of preoperative nutritional status on the postoperative complications for patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer undergoing extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. MethodsThe patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer who underwent extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected using the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA), and then who were assigned into a nutritional risk group (the score was low than 3 by the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002) and non-nutritional risk group (the score was 3 or more by the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002). The postoperative complications and survival were analyzed for the patients with or without nutritional risk. The postoperative complications were defined as early-term (complications occurring within 30 d after surgery), middle-term (complications occurring during 30–180 d after surgery), and long-term (complications occurring at 180 d and more after surgery). The survival indicators included overall survival and disease-specific survival. ResultsA total of 680 patients who met the inclusion criteria for this study were retrieved from the DACCA database. Among them, there were 500 (73.5%) patients without nutritional risk and 180 (26.5%) patients with nutritional risk. The postoperative follow-up time was 0–152 months (with average 48.9 months). Five hundreds and forty-three survived, including 471 (86.7%) patients with free-tumors survival and 72 (13.3%) patients with tumors survival. There were 137 deaths, including 122 (89.1%) patients with cancer related deaths and 15 (10.9%) patients with non-cancer related deaths. There were 48 (7.1%) cases of early-term postoperative complications, 51 (7.5%) cases of middle-term complications, and 17 (2.5%) cases of long-term complications. There were no statistical differences in the incidence of overall complications between the patients with and without nutritional risk (χ2=3.749, P=0.053; χ2=2.205, P=0.138; χ2=310, P=0.578). The specific complications at different stages after surgery (excluding the anastomotic leakage complications in the patients with nutritional risk was higher in patients without nutritional risk, P=0.034) had no statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05). The survival curves (overall survival and disease-specific survival) using the Kaplan-Meier method had no statistical differences between the patients with and without nutritional risk (χ2=3.316, P=0.069; χ2=3.712, P=0.054). ConclusionsFrom the analysis results of this study, for the rectal cancer patients who underwent extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy, the patients with preoperative nutritional risk are more prone to anastomotic leakage within 30 d after surgery. Although other postoperative complications and long-term survival outcomes have no statistical differences between patients with and without nutritional risk, preoperative nutritional management for them cannot be ignored.
Objective To compare anastomotic fistula of modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods The clinical data of 147 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2015 to June 2017 in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively analyzed. The modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 101 cases (MTL group) and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 46 cases (IPJ group). The differences of intraoperative and postoperative statuses were compared between the two groups. Results The baseline data of these two groups had no significant differences (P>0.05). Except for the average time of the pancreaticoenterostomy of the MTL group was significantly longer than that of the IPJ group (P<0.05), the intraoperative blood loss, the first postoperative exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization time, reoperation rate, death rate, and rates of complications such as the pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, anastomotic bleeding, gastric emptying disorder, and intraperitoneal infection had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Both modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy are safe and effective. An individualized selection should be adopted according to specific situation of patient.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of multidisciplinary team (MDT) model combined with Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment of early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsFrom July 2020 to December 2021, the patients with NSCLC who received Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command were collected. According to whether MDT were performed before hospitalization, the patients were divided into an MDT group and a common group. The recovery and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 187 patients were enrolled, including 81 males and 106 females, aged 63 (56, 67) years. There were 85 patients in the MDT group, and 102 patients in the common group. Compared with the common group, the MDT group had lower incidence of postoperative complications (9.4% vs. 29.4%, P=0.017), shorter intraoperative operation time [55 (45, 61) min vs. 79 (65, 90) min, P<0.001], and less intraoperative blood loss [25 (20, 30) mL vs. 30 (20, 50) mL, P=0.029] in the same operation mode. In addition, the drainage volume on the second postoperative day [270 (200, 350) mL vs. 215 (190, 300) mL, P=0.004], the number of dissected lymph nodes groups [6 (5, 6) groups vs. 5 (3, 6) groups, P=0.004] and the number of dissected lymph nodes [16 (13, 21) vs. 13 (9, 20), P=0.005] in the MDT group were significantly better than those in the common group. The differences in the postoperative intubation time and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). ConclusionMDT combined with Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery can further reduce the risk of surgery, improve the clinical treatment effect, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and accelerate the rehabilitation of patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the treatment strategies for patients with fever and pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery during COVID-19 epidemic.MethodsThe clinical data of 537 patients who ungerwent selective surgery at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shangjin Branch of West China Hospital between February and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 242 (45.1%) males and 295 (54.9%) females aged 53.3±13.4 years. We have established a procedure for the patients with fever and pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery to investigate the cause of the disease and track risk factors.ResultsThe overall postoperative complication rate was 16.4% (88/537), and 1 (0.2%) patient died. Of 537 patients, 179 (33.3%) patients were enrolled in our model according to the inclusion criteria: ratio of males [112 (62.6%) vs. 130 (36.3%), P<0.010], patients with a history of smoking [74 (41.3%) vs. 87 (24.3%), P<0.010], or with esophageal cancer surgery [36 (20.1%) vs. 15 (4.2%)], or with traditional thoracotomy [14 (7.8%) vs. 4 (1.1%)] was higher than that of the other patients. Patients in our process due to fever or pulmonary complications had longer ICU stay and postoperative hospital stay (P=0.010). Logistic regression multivariate analysis showed that gender was an independent risk factor for postoperative fever or pulmonary complications.ConclusionIn low-risk areas of the epidemic, the treatment process is simple and feasible, and the cause traceability and corresponding treatment can basically be completed within 24 hours. At the same time, the treatment process has been running stably for a long time.
ObjectiveTo provide clinical reference for the perioperative management of esophageal cancer patients with different stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) through investigating the impact of COPD on postoperative complications and survival in esophageal cancer patients undergoing oesophagectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 163 patients who underwent radical resection of esophageal cancer in our department from January 2015 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, including 124 males and 39 females, with a median age of 64 years (IQR: 23.8 years). They were divided into a COPD group (n=87) and a non-COPD group (n=76) according to the presence of COPD before operation. The clinical data were collected and the postoperative complications and 2-year survival between the two groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsThe incidence of major postoperative complications (pulmonary infection, respiratory failure, arrhythmia and anastomotic leakage) in the COPD group were higher than those in the non-COPD group (all P<0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that the severity of preoperative COPD was positively correlated with the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer (r=0.437, P<0.001). The incidence of postoperative respiratory failure and mortality in patients with severe COPD were significantly higher than those in patients without COPD and those with mild or moderate COPD. The 2-year survival rate of patients with esophageal cancer in the COPD group was lower than that in the non-COPD group (56.1% vs. 78.5.%, P=0.001), and the severity of COPD was negatively correlated to the survival rate.ConclusionCOPD significantly increases the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer, which is not conducive to the prognosis of patients, and the severity of COPD is correlated with postoperative complications and 2-year survival rate.
Objective To analyze the safety of surgical treatment and optimal surgical procedure for lung cancer patients with prior history of lung resection. Methods The medical records of 69 lung cancer patients with history of lung resection was retrospectively collected. There were 53 males and 16 females with a median age of 68 years ranging from 45 to 80 years. The risk factors for postoperative complications were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and logistic regression analysis. By comparing the data between the lobectomy and sublobectomy groups, the best surgical procedure was chosen. Results The 90-day mortality rate was 4.3%. Postoperative complication rate was 24.6%. Results of one-way ANOVA showed that blood loss during operation (P=0.020), tumor size (P=0.007), smoking (P=0.028) and FEV1%pre (P=0.018) were associated with increased major postoperative complications. Logistic regression analysis showed that FEV1%pre<77.0% (OR=0.935, 95%CI 0.888 to 0.984, P=0.010) and tumor size≥2 cm (OR=4.288, 95%CI 1.375 to 13.373, P=0.012) were independent risk factors for major postoperative complications. Lobectomy and sublobectomy groups had similar postoperative mortality and complication rate (P=0.063). Conclusion Surgical resection for selected lung cancer patients with history of lung resection is safe with low postoperative mortality and complication rate. Lobectomy with lymph node resection is the first choice if cardiopulmonary function permits. Pneumonectomy is not recommended.
ObjectiveTo investigate factors associated with postoperative complications after laparoscopic radical surgery in rectal cancer.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with rectal cancer performed by the laparoscopic radical resection from February 2013 to December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. All the data were analyzed by the t test, chi-square test or logistic regression analysis.ResultsThere were 343 patients with rectal cancer performed by the laparoscopic radical resection. The postoperative complications occurred in the 97 (28.3%) patients. The result of univariate analysis showed that the postoperative complications rate was associated with the gender, age, body mass index, preoperative anemia, preoperative comorbidity, location and diameter of tumor, operative time, and surgeon experience (all P<0.050). The results of logistic regression analysis revealed that the gender, age, body mass index, preoperative anemia, preoperative comorbidity, location of tumor, operative time, and surgeon experience were the independent risk factors for the postoperative complications (all P<0.050).ConclusionGender, age, body mass index, preoperative anemia, preoperative comorbidity, location of tumor, operative time, and surgeon experience are independent risk factors for postoperative complications in laparoscopic radical rectal surgery for rectal cancer.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors influencing major postoperative complications (MPC) after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and to construct a nomogram for accurately predicting MPC risk factors, and provide a reference for clinical decision-making. MethodsThe gastric cancer patients who underwent minimally invasive radical gastrectomy in the Department of General Surgery of the First Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital from February 2012 to December 2022 and met the inclusion criteria of this study were retrospectively collected. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression model were used to evaluate the risk factors influencing MPC and a nomogram model was constructed. The MPC were defined as Clavien-Dindo classification grade Ⅱ and beyond. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the calibration curve were used to evaluate the discrimination and accuracy of the nomogram model. ResultsA total of 362 patients were included in this study, among whom 65 cases (18.0%) experienced MPC. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the age ≥58 years old, body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2, tumor long diameter ≥30 mm, operative time ≥300 min, and preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3.7 were the risk factors influencing MPC. The nomogram model constructed using the above variables showed that the AUC (95%CI) was 0.731 (0.662, 0.801) in predicting the risk of MPC. The calibration curves showed that the prediction curve of the nomogram in predicting the MPC was agree well with the actual MPC (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: χ2=9.293, P=0.056). ConclusionFrom the results of this study, nomogram model constructed by combining age, BMI, tumor long diameter, operative time, and preoperative NLR can distinguish between patients with and without MPC after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer following NACT, and has a better accuracy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the predictive value of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in complications after thoracoscopy-assisted radical resection of esophageal cancer.MethodsWe collected the clinical data of patients who underwent thoracoscopy-assisted esophagectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2015 to June 2020. The predictive value of PNI for postoperative complications was evaluated by establishing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the optimal cut-off point was determined. The patients were divided into a high PNI group and a low PNI group according to the cut-off point. The differences of baseline data and perioperative complications-related indicators between the two groups were compared and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate the influence of PNI and other related indexes on postoperative complications.ResultsA total of 116 patients were enrolled in this study, including 75 males and 41 females, aged 65 (58-69) years. The area under ROC curve was 0.647, and the optimal cut-off point was 51.9. According to the cut-off point, there were 45 patients in the high PNI group and 71 patients in the low PNI group. The overall complication rate (χ2=10.437, P=0.001) and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection (χ2=10.811, P=0.001) were statistically different between the two groups. The results of univariate analysis showed that the duration of ventilator use (Z=–3.136, P=0.002), serum albumin value (t=2.961, P=0.004), and PNI value (χ2=10.437, P=0.001) were the possible risk factors for postoperative complications after thoracoscopy-assisted esophagectomy. The results of multivariate analysis suggested that the duration of ventilator use (OR=1.015, P=0.002) and the history of drinking (OR=5.231, P=0.013) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications, and high PNI was the protective factor for postoperative complications (OR=0.243, P=0.047).ConclusionPNI index has a certain value in predicting postoperative complications, which can quantify the preoperative nutritional and immune status of patients. Drinking history and duration of ventilator use are independent risk factors for postoperative complications of thoracoscopy-assisted esophagectomy, and high PNI is a protective factor for postoperative complications.
ObjectiveTo compare the postoperative complications following laparoscopic and open radical resection for rectal cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 681 patients with rectal cancer from January 2011 to December 2014 in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were analyzed retrospectively, of whom 583 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery (laparoscopic group) and 98 patients underwent open surgery (open group). The complications were compared between the two groups. Results①There were no statistically significant differences in the gender, age, total protein, albumin, and body mass index between the two groups (P > 0.05). As compared with the open group, the proportions of previous abdominal operation, Dixon operation, and TNM stageⅡandⅢwere lower (P < 0.05), while the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was more common (P < 0.05), the distance of the tumor lower margin from the anal verge was shorter (P < 0.05) in the laparoscopic group.②No differences were seen in terms of anastomotic leakage, pulmonary infection, urinary retention, intestinal obstruction, wound infection, abdominal sepsis, urinary tract infection, stoma complications, poor incision healing, bleeding, intestinal hemorrhage, and deep vein thrombosis between the two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe development of postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group is similar to the open group, which are both available approach to the treatment of rectal cancer. But more randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm which one is better.