Objective To analyze the risk factors inducing tumor cells exfoliating during radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods Sixty patients who were diagnosed as rectal cancer from May 2006 to November 2007 and given radical operations were assigned prospectively in this study. Before cutting the rectal stump below the tumor, saline was instilled into rectum to irrigate the stump. Collected irrigating fluids were sent to pathology laboratory, and the exfoliated malignant cells were tested by HE （haematoxylin and eosin） dyeing and common smear technique. The results of examines were collected and statistical analysis, including a Logistic regression model, was performed. Results Exfoliated malignant cells were found in 27 samples. By univariate analysis, the statistically significant factors defining a high risk of exfoliating were age, tumor size, TNM stage, operation time and operation method (Plt;0.05). Only TNM stage， operation time and operation method were confirmed by Logistic regression analysis to independently result in a statistically significant increased risk of exfoliating. Conclusion Irrigating the rectal stump before cutting down the tumor is essential to avoid local recurrence. The effects of TNM stage, tumor size and operation time are important. Although the laparoscopic surgery is more predominant than conventional surgery for non-neoplasma technology, irrigating is an important process.
Objective To investigate and evaluate prevention and treatment of seroma by transposition of tissue flaps and Arista hemostatic powder after regional lymph node resection in patients with malignant tumors. Methods Twelve patients (6 males, 6 females; aged 31-81 years, with metastatic tumors underwent prevention and treatment of seroma with the tissue flaps and Arista hemostatic powder spray after regional lymph node resection. The metastatic tumors involved the axilla in 1 patient with breast carcinoma, the iliac and inguinal regions in 2 patients with carcinomas of theuterine cervix and the rectum, and the inguinal region in 9 patients, including4 patients with malignant fibrous histiocytoma（3 in the thigh, 1 in the leg）,2 patients with squamous carcinomas in the leg, 1 patient with synovial sarcomain the knee, 1 patient with epithelioid sarcoma in the leg, and 1 patient with malignant melanoma in the foot. As for the lymph node removal therapy. 1 patientunderwent axillary lymph node removal, 2 palients underwent lymph node removal in theiliac and inguinal regions, and 9 patients underwent lymph node removal inthe inguinal region. Meanwhile, of the 12 patients, 6 patients underwent transpostion of sartourius flaps with Arista hemostatic powder, 3 patients underwent transposition of the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps (including 2 patients treatedwith Arista spray befor the wound closure and 1 patient treated by transposition of local skin flaps with Arista spray used again),and 3 patients underwent only the suturing of the wounds combined with Arista. At the same time, of the 12 patients,only 4 patient underwent the transplantation of artificial blood vessels. Results The follow-up for 2-10 months after operation revealed that 10 patients, who had received the transposition of tissue flaps and the spray of Arista hemostatic powder, had the first intention of the incision heal with seroma cured. Nine patients were given a preventive use of Arista hemostaticpowder and therefore no seroma developed. The combined use of the transpositionof tissue flaps and Arista hemostatic powder spray achieved a success rate of 100% in the prevention or treatment of seroma. However, 1 patient developed microcirculation disturbance 24 hours after operation and underwent disarticulation of the hip; 1 patient developed pelvic cavity hydrops and died 10 months after operation. Conclusion The combined use of transposition of tissue flaps and Arista hemostatic powder spray can effectively prevent or treat seroma after regional lymph node removal in a patient with malignant tumor.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic rectal resection (LR) in elderly and younger patients with rectal cancer. Methods From January 2008 to March 2009, 76 patients with rectal cancer undergoing elective rectal resection were included in this study. Older than 70 years named elderly group, in which LR was given to 16 cases, and open resection (OR) to 18 cases. Younger than 70 years named younger group, in which LR was performed in 23 cases, and OR in 19 cases. The results after LR and OR in rectal cancer between 2 groups of patients were compared. Results No surgery-assisted death occurred in either group. In 2 groups, ventilation time, intake food time and hospitalization after operation in LR were shorter than those of OR (P＜0.05， P＜0.01); intraoperative blood loss and the proportion of postoperative analgesia in LR were less than those of OR in 2 groups (P＜0.01); there were no significant differences between LR and OR (Pgt;0.05) in mean operation time or number of lymph node resected. In addition to the incision infection rate, the other complications rates and the postoperative life self-care rate between LR and OR were no significantly different in younger group (Pgt;0.05). In the elderly group, every complication rates of LR were lower than those of OR (P＜0.05), oppositely, the postoperative life self-care rate was higher (P＜0.01). Conclusions LR of rectal cancer can be applied to both elderly and younger patients. It is suggested that advanced age should not be the contraindication for LR, and by contrary elderly patients may be particularly indicated for lower postoperative complications rate compared to open surgeries.
Objective To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a comprehensive minimally invasive approach for pulmonary nodule day surgery, utilizing non-invasive localization techniques. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients diagnosed with peripheral pulmonary nodules and undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, from January 2020 to May 2024. Patients were divided into a conventional surgery group and a day surgery group based on different treatment approaches. The perioperative data between the two groups were compared. Results A total of 40 patients were included, comprising 19 males and 21 females, with an average age of (47.4±12.5) years. The day surgery group consisted of 20 patients, and the conventional surgery group consisted of 20 patients. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline demographic characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients successfully completed the surgery without any deaths or serious complications. The two groups showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05) in key indicators such as pulmonary nodule localization time, incidence of localization-related complications, operative time, blood loss, duration of postoperative chest tube placement, total length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction on the day of discharge. Conclusion Pulmonary nodule day surgery based on a comprehensive minimally invasive approach with non-invasive localization techniques can maximize the reduction of hospital stay and operative time, reduce surgery-related complications, and improve patient satisfaction and recovery speed while ensuring safety and effectiveness. This model not only meets the needs of patients but also optimizes the allocation of medical resources, demonstrating significant clinical application value and broad potential for promotion.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy of robotic, laparoscopic-assisted, and open total mesorectal excision (TME) for the treatment of rectal cancer. Methods The PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were electronically searched to identify cohort studies on robotic, laparoscopic-assisted, and open TME for rectal cancer published from January 2016 to January 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Subsequently, network meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software and R software. Results A total of 24 studies involving 12 348 patients were included. The results indicated that among the three types of surgical procedures, robotic TME showed the best outcomes by shortening the length of hospital stay, reducing the incidence of postoperative anastomotic fistula and intestinal obstruction, and lowering the overall postoperative complication rate. However, differences in the number of dissected peritumoural lymph nodes were not statistically significant. Conclusion Robotic TME shows better outcomes in terms of the radicality of excision and postoperative short-term outcomes in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, clinicians should consider the patients’ actual condition for the selection of surgical methods to achieve individualised treatment for patients with rectal cancer.
Lobectomy and systematic nodules resection has been the standard surgical procedure for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, increased small-size lung cancer has been identified with the widespread implementation of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, and it is controversial whether it is proper to choose lobar resection for the pulmonary nodules. Numerous retrospective researches and randomized clinical trials, such as JCOG0201, JCOG0804/WJOG4507L, JCOG0802 and CALGB/Alliance 140503, revealed that the sublobar resection was safe and effective for NSCLC with maximum tumor diameter≤2 cm and with consolidation tumor ratio (CTR)≤0.25, and that segmentectomy was superior to lobectomy with significant differences in 5-year overall survival rate and respiratory function for patients with small-size (≤2 cm, CTR>0.5) NSCLC and should be the standard surgical procedure. It is the principle for multiple primary lung cancer that priority should be given to primary lesions with secondary lesions considered, and it is feasible to handle the multiple lung nodules based on the patients' individual characteristics.
Objective To approach the curative effect of laparoscopic rectum resection combined with per anus intersphincteric rectal dissection and colo anal anastomosis for patients with ultra-low rectal cancer. Methods Thirteen patients were prospectively studied from June 2005 to December 2007. There were 8 male and 5 female patients, with a mean age of 53 (range, 41-69) years. All the tumors located less than 5 cm above the anal verge. All the patients were treated with general anaesthesia and then went through the following procedures: lied the reverse Trendelenburg reforming lithotomy position, the laparoscope went inside the abdomen through two apertures, the hylus aperture (observing aperture) and the McBurney point aperture (main performing aperture). After the resection through the laparoscope, the operation was translocated to the perineal region, the anus was enlarged to expose the operation area. Results The operation on all cases succeeded, there was no operative mortality, and no stomal leak in all patients. The follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 30 months (mean 17 months). Up to now, one patient developed recurrence in pelvic cavity, and one suffered hepatic metastasis, there was no port-site implantation metastasis， 9 patients had satisfactory functional recovery of anus in the sixth month after operation. Conclusion The therapy laparoscopic rectum resection combined with per anus intersphincteric rectal dissection and colo-anal anastomosis for patients with ultra-low rectal cancer is a safe, minimally invasive, anal-preserving technique with reliablity in curative effect and satisfaction in anal sphincter function.
ObjectiveBased on the latest version of the Database from Colorectal Cancer(DACCA), this study analyzed the long-term effect of neoadjuvant therapy combined with intersphincteric resection (ISR) in patients with rectal cancer. MethodsAccording to the established screening criteria, clinical data of 944 patients with rectal cancer admitted from January 2009 to December 2020 were collected from the DACCA updated on March 21, 2022, to explore the influencing factors for overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) of rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy combined with ISR, by Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results① The 3-year OS and DSS survival rates of neoadjuvant therapy combined with ISR for rectal cancer were 89.2% and 90.4%, respectively, and the 5-year OS and DSS survival rates were 83.9% and 85.4%, respectively. ② For different ISR surgical methods and neoadjuvant therapy plans, there were no significant differences in OS and DSS (P>0.05), but there were significant differences in OS and DSS among different ypTNM stage groups (P<0.001), patients with ypTNM 0–Ⅱ had better OS and DSS. ③ BMI, ypTNM stage and R0 resection were influencing factors for OS and DSS (P<0.05). ④ The overall incidence of postoperative complications was low, including 6.4% (60/944) within 30 days, 7.5% (71/944) within half a year and 3.3% (31/944) over half a year after operation. ConclusionsIn the comprehensive treatment of patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy combined with ISR can achieve relatively stable and good long-term oncological efficacy, and the incidence of short-term postoperative complications is not high, which is one of the options.
Objective To compare the effects of double stapling technique （DST） and single stapling technique （SST） in the low or ultralow anterior rectal resection and colon-anal canal anastomosis for patients with rectal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 351 patients with rectal caner， who were treated with low or ultralow anterior resection and colon-anal canal anastomosis in West China Hospital from Jan. 2009 to Dec. 2010， were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Operative and postoperative indexes of patients treated with DST （n=302） and SST （n=49） were compared. Results Compared with DST group， the distance from the dentate line to the edge of tumor， the length of the distal surgical margin 〔（1.83±0.59） cm vs. （2.07±0.56） cm〕， and hospitalization cost 〔（24 350.48±7 812.73） yuan vs.（29 455.32±7 869.33） yuan〕 of SST group were shorter or lower （P＜0.05）， but operative time was longer 〔（112.86±39.29） min vs. （100.10±36.75） min， P＜0.05〕. There were no significant differences on blood loss， duration of firstambulation， duration of first passing flatus， duration of first bowel movement， duration of pulling out nasogastric tube， duration of pulling out urinary catheter， duration of pulling out drain， postoperative hospital stay， total length of hospital stay， and the incidence of complication between the 2 groups （P＞0.05）. All patients were in functional recovery of anal control after operation. All patients were followed-up for 6-24 months （average 16 months）. During the followed-up， only 1 case suffered local tumor recurrence （SST group）， 3 cases suffered distant metastases （all in DST group）， and 15 cases （4.27％） died， of which 13 cases （4.30％） in DST group and 2 cases （4.08％） in SST group. Conclusions As in the low or ultralow anterior rectal resection and colon-anal canal anastomosis for patients with rectal cancer， SST results in shorter distal surgical margin than DST， so SST is suitable for the patients with shorter distance from the dentate line to the edge of tumor. What’s more， it saves the hospitalization cost effectively.
ObjectiveTo summarize experience of surgical treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. MethodsFrom January 2009 to July 2011, 87 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma were enrolled into the department of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. The intra-and post-operative results were analyzed. ResultsOut of 87 cases, the resection rate was 67.8% (59/87). The radical (R0) resection rate was 48.3% (42/87), R1 resection rate was 11.5% (10/87), palliative (R2) resection rate was 8.0% (7/87). The patients were successfully got through the perioperative period, threre was no operative mortality. 1-year, 3-year, 5-year survival rates of the R0 resection group were 92.9% (39/42), 31.0% (13/42), 19.0% (8/42), respectively. No patient was alive more than 3 years in the groups of R2 resection and internal or external drainage. 1-year and 2-year survival rates of the R1 resection group were 70.0% (7/10) and 20.0% (2/10), respectively. 1-year survival rate of the R2 resection group was 57.1% (4/7). 1-year survival rate of the internal or external drainage group was 35.7% (10/28). 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of the R1 resection group and R2 resection group were significantly lower than those of the R0 resection group (P<0.05). ConclusionFor hilar cholangiocarcinoma, radical resection is the only method to cure. Preoperative evaluation, percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage so as to relieve obstruction of biliary tract, proper liver resection and intraoperative pathology for resection margin are imperative guarantees lead to radical resection. Palliative resection might prolong survival time and improve quality of life.