Objective To review the progress of surgical treatment for the thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis. Methods The related literature of surgical treatment for the thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis was reviewed and analyzed from the aspects such as surgical approach, fixed segments, fusion ranges, bone graft, and bone graft material research progress. Results Most scholars prefer anterior or combined posterior approach for surgical treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis because it possessed advantage of precise effectiveness. In recent years, a simple posterior surgery achieved satisfactory effectiveness. The fixation segments are mainly composed of short segments or intervertebral fixation. The interbody fusion is better for the bone graft fusion range and manner, and the bone graft materials is most satisfied with autologous iliac Cage or titanium Cage filled with autologous cancellous bone. Conclusion The perfect strategy for treating the thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis has not yet been developed, and the personalized therapy for different patients warrants further study.
Objective To investigate the microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery and traditional open surgery for the treatment of cervical myelopathy with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods Retrospective selection of patients with OPLL who underwent microscope-assisted and traditional open anterior cervical surgery in West China (Airport) Hospital Sichuan University were selected between January 2016 and August 2020. The patients who underwent traditional open anterior cervical surgery between January 2016 and August 2018 were classified as the conventional group, and the patients who underwent microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery between September 2018 and August 2020 were classified as the microscope group. The baseline characteristics, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain before and after surgery, and surgical complications were collected. Neurological function was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Result A total of 46 patients were included. There were 24 cases in the conventional group and 22 cases in the microscope group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay in the microscope group were lower than those in the conventional group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in VSA score and JOA score between the two groups before operation (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in VAS score and JOA score between the two groups 18 months after operation (P<0.001). The comparison of VAS score and JOA score in the two groups before and after operation showed that there was a statistically significant difference between 18 months after operation and before operation (P<0.05). In the microscope group, the average improvement rate of neurological function [(79.90±16.67)% vs. (58.12±17.47)%, t=4.317, P<0.001], excellent and good rate [95.45% (21/22) vs. 66.67% (16/24), χ2=4.354, P=0.037] were higher than those in the conventional group. The total number of complications in the microscope group was lower than that in the conventional group (P=0.024). Conclusion Compared with the traditional open anterior cervical surgery, the microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery for OPLL can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.
ObjectiveTo compare the short-term effectiveness and safety of unipedicular versus bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) with posterior wall broken.MethodsThe clinical data of 68 patients with OVCF with posterior wall broken and without posterior ligament complex injury and spinal cord nerve injury between June 2013 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different operative approaches, the patients were divided into two groups: group A (36 cases received PKP via bilateral pedicle puncture) and group B (32 cases received PKP via unilateral pedicle paracentesis). There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, fracture vertebra distribution, time from injury to operation, preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and height of injured vertebra (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and bone cement volume were recorded and compared between the two groups. The VAS score and ODI score were used to evaluate the effectiveness before operation, at 1 day and 6 months after operation; the height of injured vertebra was measured on the lateral X-ray film, and the recovery height of injured vertebra at 1 day after operation and the loss height of injured vertebra at 6 months after operation were calculated; the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the two groups were recorded.ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and bone cement volume of group B were significantly less than those of group A (P<0.05). All patients were followed up 10-35 months, with an average of 18 months. During the operation, there were 2 cases (5.56%) of cement leakage in group A and 9 cases (28.13%) in group B, showing significant difference (χ2=4.808, P=0.028). There was no adverse reactions of bone cement, iatrogenic spinal cord injury, infection of puncture port, or other complications in the two groups. During the follow-up period, there were 3 cases (8.3%) of adjacent vertebral fractures in group A and 2 cases (6.3%) in group B, showing no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.027, P=0.869). The height of injured vertebra of the two groups at 1 day and 6 months after operation were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the height of injured vertebrae and the recovery height of injured vertebra at 1 day after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). However, at 6 months after operation, the height of injured vertebra in group B was significantly lower than that in group A (P<0.05), and the loss height of injured vertebra in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (P<0.05). The VAS score and ODI score at 1 day and 6 months after operation were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in both groups (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionBoth bipedicular and unipedicular PKP can obtain satisfactory effectiveness for the treatment of OVCF with posterior wall broken, but the former may have advantages of lower cement leakage rate and less height loss.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical and radiographic results between primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) via mini-subvastus or conventional approach through a prospective randomized controlled study.MethodsNinety-four patients (104 knees) undergoing primary TKA between January 2011 and April 2012 were evaluated and randomly divided into 2 groups. Forty-six patients (52 knees) underwent TKA via conventional approach (conventional approach group), and 48 patients (52 knees) underwent TKA via mini-subvastus approach (mini-subvastus approach group). In these patients, 45 cases (51 knees) in conventional approach group and 45 cases (49 knees) in mini-subvastus approach group were followed up and recruited in the final analysis. There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, sides, osteoarthritis grading, American Knee Society Score (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM) of knee between 2 groups (P>0.05). The clinical indexes were recorded and analyzed, including the operation time, length of incision, total blood loss, blood transfusion after operation, hospital stay time, the time of performing straight leg raise, incision condition, VAS score, ROM of knee, HSS score, and KSS score, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral anatomic axis and the femoral prosthesis joint angle (femoral angle), tibia anatomic axis and tibial prosthesis joint angle (tibial angle), femoral prosthesis flexion angle (FPFA), and posterior slope angle (PSA) of the tibial plateau.ResultsAll patients were followed up. The average follow-up time was 66.4 months (range, 60.0-72.5 months) in conventional approach group and 65.6 months (range, 60.0-71.2 months) in mini-subvastus approach group. Compared with the conventional approach group, the incision of mini-subvastus approach group shortened, the operation time prolonged, and the time when patients started straight leg raise exercises was earlier; showing significant differences between 2 groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospital stay time, total blood loss, and numbers of blood transfusion between 2 groups (P>0.05). The complication rate was 8.2% (4/49) in mini-subvastus approach group and 0 in conventional approach group, showing no significant difference between 2 groups (P=0.054). At 1 and 3 days, the VAS and the ROM of knee in mini-subvastus approach group were significantly better than those in conventional approach group (P<0.05); but there was no significant difference in above indexes between 2 groups at 14 day (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in HSS and KSS scores between 2 groups at the 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 3, 5 years (P>0.05). X-ray film showed no aseptic loosening in all cases. There was no significant difference in the measured values and incidence of abnormal patient of HKA, femoral angle, tibial angle, FPFA, and PSA at last follow-up between 2 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionTKA via mini-subvastus approach is helpful to the early function recovery of knee, but the long-term effectiveness is consistent with TKA via conventional approach. As the limited exposure, TKA via mini-subvastus spproach may has high risk of operative complications.
Objective To explore the clinical value of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) with multiple surgical approaches in the treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer. Methods The clinicopathologic data of 35 patients with critical resectable pancreatic head carcinoma admitted to the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery of Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University and the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2017 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received NAC before operation (AG protocol). At the end of the course of treatment, according to the type of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) [venous invasion type (BRPC-V type) and arterial invasion type (BRPC-A type)], take the individualized surgical approach for LPD (BRPC-V type: inferior mesenteric vein approach; BRPC-A type: left posterior approach, medial uncinate process approach, anterior approach, or lower mesocolon approach). The intraoperative condition, R0/R1 resection rate, lymph node dissection, postoperative complications, average hospital stay, recovery, follow-up and survival were recorded. Results① Efficacy evaluation of NAC: 13 patients were partially relieved , 17 patients were stable and 5 patients were progressive after 4 weeks of treatment. Five progressive patients continued to receive comprehensive internal medicine treatment, and the remaining 30 patients underwent LPD. ② Intraoperative situation: LPD were successfully completed in 30 patients, 2 patients underwent extended pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with superior mesenteric vein (or) portal vein reconstruction among them. Among the 30 patients with LPD, there were 10 cases of inferior mesenteric vein approach, 10 cases of left posterior approach, 6 cases of medial uncinate process approach, 1 case of left posterior approach+medial uncinate process approach, 2 cases of anterior approach, and 1 case of inferior mesocolon approach. The mean operative time was (379.4±77.3) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (436.9±95.1) mL. ③ Postoperative situation: The incidence rate of postoperative surgery-related complications was 33.3% (10/30), including 4 cases of Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ [biliary fistula in 1 case (3.3%), A-grade pancreatic fistula in 1 case (3.3%), gastric draining dysfunction in 1 case (3.3%), diarrhea in 1 case (3.3%)], 5 cases of grade Ⅱ [pulmonary infection in 2 cases (6.6%), B-grade pancreatic fistula in 2 cases (6.6%), abdominal infection in 1 case (3.3%)], and 1 case of grade Ⅲ [gastroduodenal artery stump bleeding (3.3%)]. Among the 10 patients with complications, 9 cases recovered after symptomatic treatment, and 1 case died, with a fatality rate of 3.3% (1/30). The mean postoperative hospital stay was (17.3±5.5) days. ④ Excision rate and pathological results: R0 resection rate was 90.0% (9/10) in 10 patients with BR-PV type LPD, and R1 resection was performed in 1 patient. R0 resection rate was 75.0% (15/20) in 20 patients with BR-A type, and R1 resection was performed in 5 patients (2 patients with medial uncinate process approach; Left posterior approach in 2 cases; Submesocolon approach was used in 1 case). In 30 patients with LPD, the total R0 removal rate was 80.0% (24/30), the number of lymph nodes dissected was (11±5). Pathological type: There were 26 cases (86.7%) of ductal adenocarcinoma in 30 patients, 1 case of adeno-squamous carcinoma (3.3%), 1 case of mucinous carcinoma (3.3%), 2 cases of acinocytic cell carcinoma (6.7%). 23 cases (76.7%) of medium-high differentiation and 5 cases (16.6%) of low differentiation, two cases (6.7%) were undifferentiated. ⑤ Postoperative follow-up and survival: 30 patients were completely followed-up for 6-39 months, with a median follow-up time of 17 months. The median survival time of BRPC-V and BRPC-A patients was 24.0 months and 17.0 months, respectively. The overall survival rates of 30 patients at 1, 2 and 3 years after operation were 77.3%、46.5% and 13.7%, respectively. Conclusion The selection of preoperative NAC combined with individualized surgical approach for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer is beneficial to improve the radical resection rate and clinical therapeutic effect, and has good clinical application value.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of treatment of locked lower cervical fracture and dislocation with anterior cervical fusion and internal fixation combined with the release of the interlocking facet through the Luschka joint and anterior lamina space.MethodsTwelve patients with lower cervical interlocking fracture and dislocation were analyzed retrospectively between January 2013 and June 2015. There were 7 males and 5 females, aged 25-59 years with an average age of 38.4 years. The disease duration was 9.6 hours to 100 days with an average of 7.3 days. There were 8 cases of unilateral locking and 4 cases of bilateral locking; 4 cases of old injury and 8 cases of fresh injury. The injured segments were 2 cases of C3, 4, 5 cases of C4, 5, 3 cases of C5, 6, and 2 cases of C6, 7. According to Meyerding classification, there were 9 cases of grade Ⅰ and 3 cases of grade Ⅱ. According to the functional classification of American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), there were 2 cases of grade C, 6 cases of grade D, and 4 cases of grade E. The interlocking facet was released through the Luschka joint and anterior lamina space, and the anterior cervical fusion and internal fixation were used to treat the fracture and dislocation of the lower cervical spine. The recovery of spinal cord function was judged by the functional classification of ASIA; visual analogue scale (VAS) score, neck disability index (NDI) score, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (m-JOA) score were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy; the Cobb angle of fusion segment were observed by X-ray film. The intervertebral bone graft fusion was evaluated at 6 months after operation.ResultsThe average operation time was 78.30 minutes, the average intraoperative blood loss was 167.30 mL, and the average postoperative drainage volume was 58.12 mL. No blood transfusion was given during or after operation. During the operation, there was no accidental injury of large blood vessels, esophagus, and trachea; no laryngo edema, dysphagia, hoarseness, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred after operation; no spinal cord injury or nerve root injury aggravated; the incision healed by first intention, and no infection occurred. All 12 cases were followed up 15-20 months, with an average of 16.5 months. The symptoms and function of the nerve injury were significantly improved when compared with that before operation. Re-examination of the cervical spine X-ray film at 6 months after operation showed that the Cage or bone graft was not displaced or broken, the screw was not loosened or detached, and the intervertebral graft fusion rate was up to 100%. At last follow-up, the ASIA grade, Cobb angle of fusion segment, neck pain VAS score, m-JOA score, and NDI score were significantly improved when compared with preoperative one (P<0.05).ConclusionThe effectiveness of treatment of locked lower cervical fracture and dislocation with anterior cervical fusion and internal fixation combined with the release of the interlocking facet through the Luschka joint and anterior lamina space is clear, which not only can make the injured segment get satisfactory reduction, immediate stability and reconstruction, and full decompression, but also can effectively prevent the secondary injury of spinal cord.
Objective To review the research on different surgical approaches and MRI evaluation of total hip arthroplasty (THA), to clarify the possible muscle damage caused by different approaches, and to help clinicians avoid intraoperative muscle damage and identify the causes of certain muscle-related complications after operation. MethodsThe research literature on different surgical approaches and MRI evaluation of THA at home and abroad was extensively reviewed to summarize the MRI performance of the posterior approach, modified direct lateral approach, direct anterior approach, and minimally invasive anterolateral approach (also called Orthopadische Chirurgie Munchen approach). Results The traditional posterior approach mainly damages the short external rotator muscle group and increases the incidence of postoperative dislocation; the piriformis-keeping posterior approach significantly improves the quality of the pyriformis tendon in the postoperative period, but it may lead to damage to the intrapelvic portion of the piriformis muscle. The modified direct lateral approach mainly damages the gluteus medius muscle, which increases the risk of postoperative claudication. The direct anterior approach mainly damages the vastus tensoris muscle and may result in damage to the short external rotator muscle group and the muscles around the incision. The minimally invasive anterolateral approach primarily damages the superior gluteal nerve, which subsequently leads to denervation of the broad fascial tensor fasciae latae, and this approach may also result in injury to the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus muscles. The muscle damage status significantly affects prognosis, and the minimally invasive approach is more suitable for elderly patients. ConclusionMRI can clarify the different types of muscle damage caused by different surgical approaches. Minimally invasive approaches can reduce muscle damage and improve postoperative function compared with traditional approaches, and can benefit elderly patients more, but due to the small field, forcing to expand the surgical field will lead to unintended muscle damage and reduce postoperative function.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term effectiveness of patients received surgical treatment under the guidance of “West China Classification” of desmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF) in the shoulder girdle.MethodsThe clinical data of 32 patients with DTF in the shoulder girdle admitted between June 2003 and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed, including 14 males and 18 females, aged 14-56 years with an average age of 36.8 years. The maximum diameter of the tumor was 7-19 cm, with an average of 11.1 cm. According to the “West China Classification” of DTF in the shoulder girdle, there were 4 cases of region Ⅰ, 3 cases of region Ⅱ, 6 cases of region Ⅲ, 3 cases of region Ⅳ, 5 cases of regions Ⅰ+Ⅱ, 5 cases of regions Ⅱ+Ⅲ, and 6 cases of regions Ⅰ+Ⅱ+Ⅲ. In addition, the involvement of blood vessels and nerves was also taken into consideration for choosing a surgical approach. Finally, 12 cases were operated via anteroposterior approach (group A), 14 via posterior approach (group B), and 6 via combined anterior-posterior approach (group C). The 1993 Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS93) score (including pain, limb function, satisfaction, hand position, hand flexibility, and lifting ability), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, range of motion (ROM) of shoulder joint (including flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction), and complications of patients in the 3 groups were recorded and compared.ResultsAll the 32 patients were followed up 30-190 months, with an average of 94.6 months. At last follow-up, complications occurred in 5 cases (15.6%), including 2 cases (16.6%) in group A, 2 (14.3%) in group B, and 1 (16.6%) in group C. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications among the 3 groups (P=1.000). Tumor recurrence occurred in 5 (15.6%) cases, including 1 (8.3%) case in group A, 2 (14.3%) in group B, and 1 (16.6%) in group C. No significant difference was found in the recurrence rate among the 3 groups (P=1.000). At last follow-up, MSTS93 score of pain, limb function, satisfaction, hand flexibility, and hand position in groups A and B were significantly better than those in group C (P<0.05), even though no significant difference existed between group A and group B (P>0.05). The lifting ability score in group C was significantly lower than in group A (P<0.05), and no significant difference was found between other groups (P>0.05). The JOA score and flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction activities of shoulder in groups A and B were significantly better than those in group C (P<0.05). The extension activity in group A was significantly better than that in group B (P<0.05), the flexion activity in group B was significantly better than that in group A (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in other indexes between groups A and B (P>0.05).ConclusionTaking a rational approach to fully expose and completely remove the tumor is the key point of surgical treatment for patients with DTF in the shoulder girdle. At the same time, preservation of vital structures and reconstruction of soft tissues should also be taken into consideration. Overall, surgical treatment under the guidance of “West China Classification” of DTF in the shoulder girdle has achieved satisfactory long-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo analyze the relation between preoperative staging and surgical decision-making in rectal cancer patients from the West China Colorectal Cancer Database (DACCA) and to identify key factors influencing the selection of surgical approach. MethodsBased on the updated DACCA dataset as of April 24, 2024, the patients with rectal cancer were included. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation between preoperative staging [(y)cTNM stage] and the selection of sphincter-preserving surgery or intersphincteric resection (ISR). Additional factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, and nutritional score, were assessed for their impact on surgical choices. ResultsA total of 2 733 rectal cancer patients were included. Preoperative (y)cTNM staging distribution was as follows: 23 (0.8%) at stage 0, 388 (14.2%) at stage Ⅰ, 760 (27.8%) at stage Ⅱ, 873 (31.9%) at stage Ⅲ, and 689 (25.2%) at stage Ⅳ. The preoperative stage Ⅱ–Ⅳ were the independent risk factors for both the choices of sphincter-preserving surgery and ISR [stage Ⅱ: sphincter-preserving surgery: OR(95%CI)=13.634 (4.952, 37.540), P<0.001; ISR: OR (95%CI)=3.097 (2.108, 4.551), P<0.001. stage Ⅲ: sphincter-preserving surgery: OR (95%CI)=14.677 (5.339, 40.345), P<0.001; ISR: OR (95%CI)=2.985 (2.042, 4.363), P<0.001. stage Ⅳ: OR (95%CI)=25.653 (9.320, 70.610), P<0.001; ISR: OR (95%CI)=4.445 (3.015, 6.555), P<0.001]. The low/ultra-low tumor location was an independent risk factor for choice of sphincter-preserving surgery [OR (95%CI)=2.038 (1.489, 2.791), P<0.001], but which was an independent protective factor for the choice of ISR [OR (95%CI)=0.013 (0.009, 0.019), P<0.001]. ConclusionsResults of this study are consistent with clinical practice, indicating that preoperative staging is the core basis for surgical decision-making in rectal cancer. With the progression of staging, patients are more inclined to choose non-sphincter-preserving and non-ISR procedures. Although low/ultralow tumors pose great challenges for anal preservation, the proportion of ISR selection remains relatively high. The anatomical location of the tumor and nutritional status also significantly affect surgical selection, necessitating comprehensive preoperative evaluation.
Objective To explore decompression strategies for lateral lumbar spinal stenosis under unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) assistance. Methods A clinical data of 86 patients with lateral lumbar stenosis treated with UBE-assisted intervertebral decompression between September 2022 and December 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 42 males and 44 females with an average age of 63.6 years (range, 45-79 years). The disease duration ranged from 6 to 14 months (mean, 8.5 months). Surgical levels included L2, 3 in 3 cases, L3, 4 in 26 cases, L4, 5 in 42 cases, and L5, S1 in 15 cases. According to Lee’s grading system, there were 21 cases of grade 1, 37 cases of grade 2, and 28 cases of grade 3 for lumbar spinal stenosis. Based on the location of stenosis and clinical symptoms, the 33 cases underwent interlaminar approach, 7 cases underwent interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision, 26 cases underwent contralateral inclinatory approach, and 20 cases underwent paraspinal approach; then, the corresponding decompression procedures were performed. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate lower back/leg pain before operation and at 1 and 3 months after operation, while Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate spinal function. At 3 months after operation, the effectiveness was evaluated using the modified MacNab evaluation criteria. The spinal stenosis and decompression were evaluated based on Lee’s grading system using lumbar MRI before operation and at 3 months after operation. ResultsAll procedures were successfully completed with mean operation time of 95.1 minutes (range, 57-166 minutes). Dural tears occurred in 2 cases treated with interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision. All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 3-10 months (mean, 5.9 months). The clinical symptoms of the patients relieved to varying degrees. The VAS scores and ODI of lower back and leg pain at 1 and 3 months after operation significantly improved compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05), and the indicators at 3 months significantly improved than that at 1 month (P<0.05). According to the modified MacNab evaluation criteria, the effectiveness at 3 months after operation was rated as excellent in 52 cases, good in 21 cases, and poor in 13 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 84.9%. No lumbar instability was detected on flexion-extension X-ray films during follow-up. The Lee’s grading of lateral lumbar stenosis at 2 days after operation showed significant improvement compared to preoperative grading (P<0.05). ConclusionFor lateral lumbar spinal stenosis, UBE-assisted decompression of the spinal canal requires the selection of interlaminar approach, interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision, contralateral inclinatory approach, and paraspinal approach based on preoperative imaging findings and clinical symptoms to achieve better effectiveness.