ObjectiveTo investigate the significance of catheter thrombolysis combined with one-stage iliac vein percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (or stent implantation) in the treatment of acute left lower extremity deep venous thrombosis secondary to Cockett syndrome.MethodsForty-one cases of Cockett syndrome complicated with acute left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis were retrospectively analyzed and summarized in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2019. Catheter directed thrombolysis was performed under the protection of filter, and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stent implantation was performed in the first stage of the iliac vein stenosis or occlusion after thrombolysis. Compared the circumference of upper and lower legs of 15 cm above and below patella of the healthy and affected limbs, before and after treatment, and analyzed the venous patency rate.ResultsThe average time of using thrombolytic catheter were (7±3) days, and the average dosage of urokinase was (358.32±69.38) ×104 U. A total of thirty-five Bard stents were implanted (35 cases), four cases underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and two cases gave up treatment. Before and after treatment, the circumference difference of the higher leg, the circumference difference of the lower leg, and the venous patency were significantly different before and after thrombolysis (P<0.01). The venous patency rate was 58%–75% in this group, and the average venous patency rate was (61±10)%. There was no severe bleeding complication occurred. Thirty-five patients were followed up for 3–26 months, the preservation rate of the valve was 82.86% (29/35), and the first patency rate of iliac vein was 100% (39/39). During the follow-up period, thrombosis recurred in one case of untreated iliac vein, and acute thrombosis in the right side of one case was caused by long iliac vein stent entering the inferior vena cava. No pulmonary embolism was found.ConclusionOn the basis of catheter thrombolysis, one stage removal of iliac vein obstruction in the treatment of acute left lower extremity deep venous thrombosis can relieve the clinical symptoms, reduce the recurrence rate of thrombosis, and reduce the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis syndrome after catheter thrombolysis.
Objective To investigate the short-term result of catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) in treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in lower extremity. Methods A total of 289 cases of acute DVT in lower extremity who got treatment in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group Suqian City People’s Hospital and Xuzhou Central Hospital from March 2013 to December 2014 were enrolled prospectively, and of them, 125 cases of system thrombolysis (ST) group underwent ST, 164 cases of CDT group underwent inferior vena cava filter placement (IVCF)+CDT. Clinical effect was compared between the 2 groups. Results Clinical symptoms of all cases were obviously relieved, and limb swelling was significantly reduced. Of the CDT group, 73 cases presented iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS), and 43 cases of them underwent the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent implantation. In CDT group, there was 1 case complicated by catheter displacement, 10 cases suffered from puncture site ecchymosis, 3 cases suffered from hematuria. In ST group, there was 1 case suffered from pulmonary embolism (PE), 14 cases suffered from bleeding gums, 22 cases suffered from hematuria, 3 cases suffered from skin and mucosa petechia, and 2 cases suffered from melena (didn’t need transfusion). The morbidity of ST group was higher than that of CDT group (P=0.002). There were 18 cases suffered from recurrence in ST group, 15 cases suffered from recurrence in CDT group, but there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the 2 groups (P=0.786). In addition, the dosage of urokinase, thrombolysis time, blood vessel patency score, thigh circumference after treatment, and calf circumference after treatment in ST group were all higher than those of CDT group (P<0.050), but the Villalta score in ST group was lower than that of CDT group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in hospital stay (P=0.383). Conclusion For acute DVT in lower extremity, CDT has a superior short-term outcome with safety and feasibility.
ObjectiveTo observe and compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase or urokinase in the first-ever acute ischemic stroke patients arriving at the hospital 3.5-4.5 h after onset.MethodsClinical data of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated in Shihezi People’s Hospital between January 2019 and October 2020 were prospectively collected. The National Insititutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on the 7th day and the 90th day, the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and the Blessed Behavior Scale (BBS) score on the 90th day, and symptomatic bleeding within 36 h after thrombolysis were analyzed and compared between the patients receiving alteplase threatment (the alteplase group) and the ones receiving urokinase treatment (the urokinase group).ResultsTotally 96 patients were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Among them, 58 patients received alteplase threatment and 38 received urokinase treatment. The difference in NIHSS, mRS, or BBS scores between the two groups before treatment was not statistically significant (P>0.05). On the 90th day after treatment, the NIHSS, mRS, and BBS scores of the alteplase group were 3.59±3.73, 2.26±1.26, and 15.33±8.28, respectively, and those of the urokinase group were 5.95±4.88, 3.00±0.87, and 20.37±11.80, respectively; the differences between the two groups were all statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage between the two groups within 36 h after treatment (P>0.05). Multiple linear regression analyses showed that the treatment method was related to the NIHSS score on the 7th day, the NIHSS score on the 90th day, the mRS score on the 90th day, and the BBS score on the 90th day (P<0.05), the history of heart disease was related to the mRS score on the 90th day (P<0.05), and the income was related to the BBS score on the 90th day (P<0.05).ConclusionFor the hyperactue ischemic stroke, the overall effect of alteplase treatment may be better than that of urokinase treatment.
ObjectiveTo assess the therapeutic effect of catheter thrombolysis combined with inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) complicated with floating IVC thrombus. MethodsThe clinical data of 16 patients with DVT complicated with floating IVC thrombus from July 2013 to November 2014 in this hospital were collected. These patients were treated with the catheter thrombolysis combined with IVC filter placement, the IVC filter was placed via jugular vein, the catheter thrombolysis was performed by the side of the small saphenous vein, the amount of urokinase was (60-80) ×104 U/d. Results①The floating IVC thrombi of 13 patients were disappeared following catheter thrombolysis combined with IVC filter placement therapy, a small amount of visible thrombi were adhered on the recycled IVC filter, the lower limb swelling was relieved, the IVC could effectively open.②The IVC filters of 2 patients could not be recycled due to the adhesion of floating IVC thrombus and lumen of IVC resulting in luminal stenosis.③The floating IVC thrombus of 1 patient was disappeared, the IVC filter could not be recy-cled due to a large of thrombi adhered on the IVC filter. The lower limb swelling was slowly relieved. The complications such as severe pulmonary embolism didn't happen in all the patients during treatment and following-up. ConclusionThe limited data preliminarily shows that it is an effective and safe method by catheter thrombolysis combined with IVC filter placement in treatment of DVT complicated with floating IVC thrombus.
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of low-(10 mg) and high-dose (20 mg) of recombinant tissue typeplasminogen activator (rt-PA) catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower limb ischemia by using meta-analysis. MethodsThe literatures of randomized clinical trials (RCT) concerning low-versus high-dose rt-PA catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower limb ischemia study were searched using the national and international electronic databases.The literatures were screened and quality evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and analyzed by using the Cochrane Center the RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 4 RCT studies, with a total of 360 patients (192 patients in low dose group and 168 patients in high-dose group) were included.No statistical difference were noted in low-versus high-dose group with regard to ankle-brachial index (RR=0.20, 95%CI=-0.43-0.02, P=0.07), 30 days amputation-free survival (RR=1.00, 95%CI=0.94-1.08, P=0.91), 6 months the probability of restenosis (RR=1.00, 95%CI=0.60-1.67, P=1.00), and the incidence of groin hematoma (< 5 cm, RR=1.24, 95%CI=0.56-2.77, P=0.59).But the incidence of bleeding and the incidence of stress ulcer in low-dose group were lower than those in high-dose group (RR=2.38, 95%CI=1.10-5.15, P=0.03;RR=2.49, 95%CI=1.21-5.13, P=0.01). ConclusionTwo doses of rt-PA treatment of limb ischemia similar efficacy, but the incidence of low-dose regimen of complications is significantly lower than the high dose regimen.
Objective To study the effect of the intracavity thrombolysis, aspiration of debris, percutaneous transcathete angioplasty (PTA) and percutaneous transtuminl angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) on treating peripheral arterial obliterans disease (PAOD). Methods From May 1994 to May 2008, interventional treatment was performed in 285 patients with PAOD. Intracavity thrombolysis and aspiration of debris were performed in 63 patients suffering from acute arterial occlusion. Intracavity thrombolysis and PTA were performed in 61 patients suffering from arteriostenosis combined with acute occlusion. Intracavity thrombolysis, PTA and PTAS were performed in 161 patients suffering from chronic arteriostenosis occlusion. Results Total success rate was 98.25% (280/285). The success rate in intracavity thrombolysis and aspiration of debris was 96.83% (61/63), with 88.89% (56/63) of the blood vessels restored, 7.94% (5/63) of the blood vessels partially restored, and another 3.17% (2/63) failed. The success rate in intracavity thrombolysis and PTA was 85.25% (52/61). The success rate in PTA and PTAS was 98.14% (158/161). The total complication rate was 7.02% (20/285), of them the local thrombolysis and thromboclasis accounting for 7.94% (5/63), the local thrombolysis and PTA accounting for 14.75% (9/61), the PTA and stent implantation accounting for 3.73% (6/161). Conclusion Percutaneous transluminal treatment for stenotic and occlusive lesions of peripheral artery can effectively keep the blood vessel unobstructed for a long time and raise the haemodynamics index remarkably.
ObjectiveTo investigate the main influence factors of microbubble-enhanced sono-thrombolysis by an orthogonal array experimental design (OAD) and to confirm the optimal parameters of microbubble-enhanced sono-thrombolysis in vitro. Methods The peripheral blood was collected from 50 female Sprague Dawley rats to prepare the standard plasma, and then 100 μL standard plasma and 25 μL thrombin (0.15 U/μL) were mixed and incubated in 37℃ water bath for 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours respectively to prepare corresponding standardized thrombus. The physical parameters for the designed experiments included transmit powers of ultrasound (factor A: 5%, 25%, 50%, and 100%), microbubble volume (factor B: 50, 100, 200, and 400 μL), urokinase (UK) concentration (factor C: 100, 200, 400, and 800 U/mL), and thrombolysis time (factor D: 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes), respectively. Then an OAD based on four parameters and four levels [L16(45)] was employed to optimize the thrombolysis conditions. The ultrasound frequency was 1.82 MHz. HE staining and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used to observe the clots before and after thrombolysis. The thrombolysis rate was measured. ResultsHE staining and SEM observation showed that the fibrin was dissolved after thrombolysis. According to the OAD, the optimal parameter combination was C4-D4-A1-B4, indicating UK concentration 800 U/mL, thrombolysis time 40 minutes, transmit power of ultrasound 5%, and microbubble volume 400 μL, respectively. The four factors above had significant influence on thrombolysis (P lt; 0.05), and UK concentration was the most significant. There were significant differences in thrombolysis between different thrombolysis time (P lt; 0.05). ConclusionUnder the condition of fixed ultrasound frequency, microbubble-enhanced sono-thrombolysis efficiency is better in lower transmit power of ultrasound, higher UK concentration, longer thrombolysis time, higher microbubble volume, and shorter thrombolysis time
Objective To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of transcatheter directed thrombolysis （TDT） approach in treatment for deep venous thrombosis （DVT） of lower limbs and as compared with trans-dorsal pedis vein thrombolysis （TPVT） approach. Methods The clinical data of 437 patients with acute DVT （184 males and 253 females） at the age of （43±12） years （range 19-76 years） from July 2008 to January 2012 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were analyzed retrospectively. Patients in the group TDT received TDT were 293 cases， 32 inferior vena cava filters were implanted. Patients in the group TPVT received TPVT were 65 cases， 4 inferior vena cava filters were implanted. Results The resolution time of thrombus in the group TDT was shorter than that in the group TPVT （6 d versus 9 d， P＜0.05）. The circumference difference of leg or upper leg before and after treatment in the TDT group was significantly greater than that in the TPVT group （P＜0.05）. The rate of venous patency was （65.2±15.4）% and preservation rate of valvular function was （78.2±12.6）% in the group TDT， and which was （63.8±16.3）% and （91.1±10.7）% in the group TPVT， respectively. The differences of venous patency rate was not statistically significant（P＞0.05） between two groups， but the prevervation rate of valvular function was significant difference （P＜0.05） .Hematomas in 3 cases and gross hematuria in 4 cases were observed， and displacement of inferior vena cava filter occurred in 1 patient in the group TDT. The gums bleed or gross hematuria in 5 cases were observed in the group TPVT. Conclusions Both TDT and TPVT can effectively relieve symptoms. TDT can shorten the course of disease， but itincreases functional damage of the deep vein valvular.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) versus anti-coagulation (AC) for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang Data and CNKI databases to collect randomized clinical trials (RCTs) about CDT versus AC for DVT from inception to March 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 5 RCTs and 989 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two group in incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.49 to 1.09, P=0.13), iliofemoral venous patency rate (RR=2.57, 95%CI 0.59 to 11.24, P=0.21), bleeding (RR=2.03, 95%CI 0.50 to 8.28, P=0.32), severe bleeding (RR=1.77, 95%CI 0.91 to 3.42, P=0.09) and recurrence rate of venous thromboembolism (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.42 to 2.36, P=0.99). However, the incidence of moderate-severe PTS decreased in CDT group was lower than that in the control group (RR=0.70, 95%CI 0.53 to 0.92, P=0.01). ConclusionsCompared with the control group, catheter-directed thrombolysis does not reduce the incidence of PTS and VTE recurrence rate, cannot improve the long-term patency of the iliofemoral vein, yet can prevent the occurrence of moderate to severe PTS. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo compare the differences of incidence rate and severity of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) of patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) treated by catherter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) or via peripheral vein thrombolysis (PVT).MethodsThe patients with unilateral lower extremity DVT who had received anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapy in the Nanchong Central Hospital from January 2012 to January 2015 were collected. These patients were divided into CDT group and PVT group according to the different thrombolysis methods, and then the thrombolytic rates, thrombolytic complications, and the incidence rate and severity of PTS of 5-year follow up results were calculated and compared.ResultsA total of 137 cases of DVT were collected, 79 in the CDT group and 58 in the PVT group. There were no significant differences in the gender, age, course of disease, thrombus type, and other baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The thrombolytic rate of the CDT group was (78.6±16.3)% and PVT group was (27.3±12.1)%, the difference was significant (t=21.14, P<0.001). The rate of thrombolytic complications between the PVT group and CDT group had no statistical significance (32.8% versus 21.5%, χ2=2.18, P=0.134). The 5-year follow up was completed in 116 cases, 74 patients from the CDT group and 42 patients from the PVT group respectively, the result showed that the incidence rate of the PTS in the CDT group was lower than that in the PVT group (35.1% versus 88.1%, χ2=30.28, P<0.001), and theseverity of PTS in the CDT group was milder than that in the PVT group too (Z=16.52,P<0.001).ConclusionFrom the results of this study, CDT is able to increase thrombolytic rate and effectively reduce incidence rate and severity of PTS.