Objective Choose polylactide-co-glycolide/hydroxyapatite (PLGA/HA) and porous phosphate calcium (PPC) as the object that we will study, compare their degradabality and choose one as a suitable scaffold for rib reconstruction. Methods All the experiments were divided into PLGA/HA group and CPC group. Degradabality experiment in exvivo: put the two scaffold which have the same size into 0.9% NaCl, keep sterile, then put the container into warm cage，get out and weigh them in 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks, compare the different speed of the two scaffold. Degradability experiment in vivo: put the two scaffold which have the same size under the skin of the rabbit, and weigh them in 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks, the tissue around the scaffold was examinzed by HE and the scaffold was examined by electron scanning microscope. Results Micro-CT and Scanning electron microscopy shows that CPC group had better structure （1101.2228±0.6184 mg/ccm vs. 1072.5523±0.7442 mg/ccm）and porosity（70.26％±0.45％ vs.72.82％±0.51％）than PLGA/HA group; The result of degradabality experiment in vitro shows that the speed of the two scaffolds was slow. It is at 24 weeks that the degradability is obvious,and the PLGA/HA group degraded a lot which was 60%. The result of degradabality experiment in vivo shows that the speed of degradabality of PLGA/HA group was faster than that is in the 0.9% Nacl, also was faster than that of CPC group which was 96%.The reponse of tissue around the PLGA/HA was more sever than that of CPC group which is in favour of the growth of cells. Conclusion As for the reconstruction of large defect of rib, CPC is more suitable than PLGA/HA.
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of 3D single-portal inflatable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.MethodsClinical data of 28 patients, including 25 males and 3 females, aged 51-76 years, with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing single-portal inflatable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy from June 2018 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods including a 3D mediastinoscopic group (3D group, 10 patients) and a 2D mediastinoscopic group (2D group, 18 patients). The perioperative outcome of the two groups were compared.ResultsCompared with the 2D group, the 3D group had shorter operation time (P=0.017), more lymph nodes resected (P=0.005) and less estimated blood loss (P=0.015). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the main surgeon's vertigo and visual ghosting (P>0.05). The other aspects including the indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay, pulmonary infection, arrhythmia, anastomotic fistula, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury were not statistically significant between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionThe 3D inflatable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, which optimizes the surgical procedures of 2D, is safe and feasible, and is worthy of clinical promotion in the future.
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of 3D thoracoscopic surgery in uniportal lobectomy.MethodsClinical data of 248 patients with lung cancer who underwent uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy in our hospital from September 2018 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods, a 3D thoracoscopic group (76 patients, including 52 males and 24 females with an average age of 58.59±7.62 years) and a 2D thoracoscopic group (172 patients, including 102 males and 70 females with an average age of 57.75±8.59 years). Statistical analysis of clinical and pathological data, lymph node dissection, surgical complications, postoperative hospital stay, etc was performed.ResultsCompared with the 2D thoracoscopic group, the 3D thoracoscopic group had shorter operation time, more lymph nodes dissected and pleural effusion on the first day after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative chest tube duration, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of pulmonary infection, arrhythmia, bronchopleural fistula, or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury between the two groups.ConclusionCompared with the traditional 2D thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery, uniportal lobectomy with 3D thoracoscopic surgery is safer and more efficient during operation, and lymph node dissection is more thorough, which is worth promoting.
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of naked eye 3D thoracoscopic surgery in minimally invasive esophagectomy.MethodsClinical data of 65 patients, including 50 males and 15 females aged 47-72 years, with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy from October 2018 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods including a naked eye 3D thoracoscopic group (group A: 30 patients) and a traditional 2D thoracoscopic group (group B: 35 patients). The effects of the two groups were compared.ResultsThe operation time in the group A was significantly shorter than that in the group B (P<0.05). The number of dissected lymph nodes in the group A was more than that in the group B (P<0.05). The thoracic drainage volumes on the 1th-3th days after operation in the group A were significantly larger than those in the group B (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups on the 4th-5th days after operation (P>0.05). The indwelling time in the group A was longer than that in the group B (P<0.05). Postoperative hospital stay, pulmonary infection, arrhythmia, anastomotic leakage, and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionNaked eye 3D thoracoscopic surgery for minimally invasive esophagectomy is a safe and effective surgical procedure. Compared with traditional 2D minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery, it is safer in operation and more thorough in clearing lymph nodes. The operation is more efficient and can be promoted.