目的探讨腹腔镜技术在治疗外伤性脾破裂中的可行性和安全性。 方法回顾性分析笔者所在医院2012年3月至2014年3月期间应用腹腔镜技术救治的19例外伤性脾破裂患者的临床资料。 结果本组19例患者中，顺利完成腹腔镜手术17例，中转开腹2例，均获得成功救治，痊愈出院。其中行腹腔镜下电凝止血＋生物蛋白胶黏合保脾4例，行腹腔镜下无损伤线缝合＋网膜覆盖保脾8例，行腹腔镜脾切除术5例，中转开腹行脾切除术2例。手术时间50～186 min，平均90 min；术中失血250～2 200 mL，平均780 mL；术后住院时间7～26 d，平均13.5 d，术后均无并发症发生。术后19例患者均获访，随访时间为3～12个月，平均8个月。随访期间无死亡及远期并发症发生。 结论对外伤性脾破裂患者选择性施行的腹腔镜脾修补术和脾切除术具有良好的效果，其具有创伤小、痛苦轻及恢复快的优点，安全而可行，值得推广。
Objective To compare the difference of the changes of platelet counts after splenectomy between the patients with splenic rupture and patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, and to analyze the possible reasons and clinical significance. Methods The platelet count of 47 splenic rupture patients and 36 cirrhosis patients who had been carried out splenectomy from July 2008 to December 2009 in our hospital were counted, and the differences in platelet count and it’s change tendency of two groups were compared. Results In the splenic rupture group，the platelet count of all 47 patients increased abnormally after operation, the maxlmum value of platelet count among 300×109/L-600×109/L in 6 cases，600×109/L-900×109/L in 21 cases，and above 900×109/L in 20 cases. In the cirrhosis group，the maxlmum value of platelet count after operation was above 300×109/L in 26 cases，100×109/L-300×109/L in 8 cases，and below 100×109/L in 2 cases. The difference of maxlmum value of platelet count in the two groups had statistic significance（P=0.00）. Compared with the cirrhosis group, the platelet count increased more significant and decreased more slow in splenic rupture group（P＜0.05）.The abnormal days and rising range of platelet count were higher in patient with Child A than Child B and C（P=0.006，P=0.002）. Conclusions The change of platelet count after operation in splenic rupture group was obviously different from cirrhosis group because of the difference of the liver function and body situation of patients. To patients with splenic rupture or cirrhosis, appropriate treatment based on the platelet count and liver function could obtain good therapeutic effect.
目的 探讨非手术治疗外伤性脾破裂的可行性及适应证。 方法 回顾分析1998年以来山东省聊城市第二人民医院非手术治疗88例外伤性脾破裂的临床资料及其治疗效果。结果 88例均经B超检查确诊脾破裂，Ⅰ级损伤19例，Ⅱ级损伤57例，Ⅲ级损伤12例，其中16例患者合并肋骨骨折，11例合并肝外伤，9例合并肾挫伤，4例合并颅脑损伤，3例中转手术。结论 有选择地采用非手术治疗外伤性脾破裂安全、有效，轻度的肝肾损伤、腹腔外器官合并伤及患者的年龄并不影响非手术治疗的疗效。
目的 探讨外伤闭合性脾破裂行脾保留手术的术式及疗效。方法 回顾性分析我院2001年6月至2012年5月期间对外伤闭合性脾破裂行脾保留手术的32例患者的临床资料。结果 32例外伤闭合性脾破裂患者中行单纯黏合剂止血6例（Ⅰ级），单纯缝合修补6例（Ⅰ级），缝合修补加黏合剂止血13例（Ⅰ/Ⅱ级），脾部分切除手术4例（Ⅱ/Ⅲ级），脾动脉结扎加脾修补术3例（Ⅱ/Ⅲ级）。32例行脾保留手术患者中除1例因手术后再出血行脾切除获治愈外，其余31例均获保脾成功，术后3～6个月行B超和CT检查示脾脏生长良好，IgM、C3、C4等免疫功能指标均在正常范围。结论 对Ⅰ～Ⅲ级外伤闭合性脾破裂行脾保留手术安全、可行，疗效好，对保留和恢复脾脏功能有重要意义。
From 1982 to 1991, there were 13 cases of traumatic rupture of spleen, 26 percent in a total of 50 cases of splenic rupturesin the same period. The abdominal punctures were all positive preoperatively. In general, traumatic rupture of spleen should bc first repaired, if it failed, the subsplenectomy or transplatation of autosplenic tissues in the omental sack might be adopted. We used the technique to repair the ruptured splenic tissues in order to achieve cure. They did not require a second operation. Immunoiogical evaluation was normal 3-4 week safter operation .No postoperative sepsis was encountered.The follow-up results were good (1-7years,mean 3.5years).
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and feasibility of the treatment of laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with traumatic splenic rupture. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2009, 48 cases of traumatic splenic rupture underwent laparoscopic splenectomy were analyzed in this hospital. According to the differrent styles of splenic stalk, different operative methods were taken， including titanic clipping in 12 cases， titanic clipping combining silk suture ligation in 8 cases， snare combining titanic clipping in 10 cases， LigaSure in 8 cases， and EndoGIA in 8 cases. ResultsLaparoscopic splenectomy was successfully completed in 32 cases; Handassisted laparoscopic splenectomy was applied in 14 cases, and 2 cases were converted to laparotomy because of tight spleen adhesion with surrounding tissues and bleeding rupture of the short gastric vessels. The operation time was 120－170 min with an average 140 min; the estimated intraoperative amount of blood loss was 300－1 200 ml with an average 800 ml. No postoperative complication occurred such as gastric fistula, pancreatic fistula or hemorrhage. Conclusion According to the differrent styles of splenic stalk, individual operative method can improve mission success rate in the laparoscopic splenectomy in traumatic splenic rupture.
目的 探讨脾切除术后再出血的原因及诊治方法并总结其预防措施。方法 对我院1998年8月至2009年3月收治的11例脾切除术后再出血患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 本组11例再出血患者均行急诊再手术治疗，10例治愈,无术后并发症，恢复顺利，切口愈合良好，均拆线出院，术后住院10～21 d（平均15 d）； 余1例外伤性脾破裂者术中探查为胃短动脉破裂出血，遂结扎胃短动脉，术后发生胃瘘，经禁食、静脉营养等治疗，效果差，于术后20 d死亡。结论 脾切除术后再出血原因较多，以胃短血管处理不当、脾蒂血管结扎线脱落、胰尾部血管损伤及患者凝血功能障碍为主。脾切除术后出血以预防为主，术前充分做好各项准备，术中止血彻底，术后特别是术后24 h内严密观察腹腔引流液的量、性质及速度。再出血后果严重，一旦发生，应及时准确诊断，行急诊再手术治疗。