The annual incidence of diabetic foot ulcers in China is as high as 8.1%, which ranks first among the causes of chronic wounds in China. Although through the efforts of several generations of podiatrists and the building of multidisciplinary collaboration team, the major amputation rate in patients with diabetic foot ulcers in China has been decreased significantly, it is still far higher than the level of developed countries in Europe and the United States. Therefore, in order to cope with the increasing occurrence and recurrence of refractory diabetic foot ulcers, in addition to further optimizing the construction of multidisciplinary collaboration team, it is an urgent topic for us to explore the construction of a multidisciplinary integrated team to seamlessly connect the diagnosis and treatment of different aspects of foot disease. This article describes the importance and necessity of building a wound repair center with Chinese characteristics, which is a model of multidisciplinary integrated team, aiming at provide a theoretical basis for establishing a multidisciplinary integrated management model and realizing seamless connection between diagnosis and treatment, so as to further improve the cure rate of diabetic foot ulcers.
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of silver dressings on treating diabetic foot ulcer infection. MethodsA total of 105 patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated from May 2012 to April 2014 were randomly divided into two groups:group A and B. Patients in group A were treated with imported silver ion alginate dressing, while group B was treated with domestic nanometer silver dressing. All patients were given basic treatment, and the effect of silver dressing was evaluated by observing bacterial clearance rate and wound healing score. ResultsThere were significant improvement in bacterial clearance rate and wound healing score in both two groups after treatment. The bacterial clearance rate was similar between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the descending trend of wound healing score in group A was significantly more obvious than group B (P<0.01). ConclusionBoth two silver dressings are effective in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer infection, but the effectiveness of silver ion alginate dressing is superior. Bacterial clearance rate and wound healing score are objective and applicable index to evaluate the treatment effects of silver dressing.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy of ultrasound debridement combined with autolytic debridement in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.MethodsA total of 60 diabetic foot ulcers patients who were diagnosed and treated in Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University from April 2019 to April 2020 were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into two groups, with 30 cases in each group. The trial group received autolytic cleansing combined with ultrasound debridement treatment, and the control group only received autolytic debridement treatment. The baseline conditions, wound treatment efficacy, number of dressing changes, length of hospital stay, treatment cost, wound healing time, wound shrinkage rate, and the time required for the wound to turn into 100% red granulation were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in gender, age, duration of diabetes or Wagner grade of diabetic foot between the two groups (P>0.05). The efficacy of wound healing in the trial group was better than that in the control group (Z=−2.146, P=0.032). The number of dressing changes [(11.76±2.23) vs. (17.34±4.43) times] and the length of stay [(18.03±3.73) vs. (25.43±4.43) d] in the trial group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The difference in treatment cost between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The wound healing time of the trial group [(48.43±18.34) vs. (65.24±19.62) d], the wound shrinkage rate [(78.35±8.34)% vs. (56.53±6.54)%] and the time required for the wound to turn into 100% red granulation [(16.34±2.42) vs. (24.55±3.23) d] were better than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). During the treatment process, no patient in the trial group had wound bleeding and had difficulty in stopping bleeding during ultrasonic debridement, and no patient had intolerable pain related to ultrasonic debridement. No patients in either group withdrew early.ConclusionsUltrasound debridement combined with autolytic debridement can effectively improve the curative effect of patients with diabetic foot ulcers and shorten the wound healing time. Therefore, it is worthy of promotion and application in the wound care of patients with diabetic foot ulcers.
Objective To systematically analyze the randomized controlled trials that compare tissue-engineered skin (TES) with conventional treatment for chronic diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) in terms of effectiveness and utilization.Methods We searched the electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CBMWeb, CNKI, and VIP) in order to compare the efficiency and safety between TES and conventional treatment (CT) in the patients with DFU. In addition, we manually searched reference lists from original studies and review articles.Results Seven trials were included, which were all randomized controlled trials and had a duration of DFU over 6 weeks. There were 880 participants that met inclusion criteria in all studies, and all patients underwent pre-treatment procedures and were treated by TES (human skin equivalents, living skin equivalents or bioengineered skin, such as Graftskin, Dermagraft and Graftjacket) for 12 weeks. All trials had two groups: the treatment group and the control group, but the two trials divided the treatment groups into 3 different dosages and 2 different ulcer allocation subgroups, respectively. Meta-analysis results showed significant differences in the rate of complete wound closure (Plt;0.0001, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.20) and in the occurrence of complications and severe adverse events (P=0.008, 95%CI – 0.06 to – 0.01) between TES treated patients and conventionally treated patients. Conclusion The review shows TES improves completed closure of DFU compared with CT, and it is more effective in reducing side effects.
Diabetic foot ulcer is one of the severe chronic complications that lead to disability and death of diabetic patients. In order to solve this problem, adjuvant therapy studies of diabetic foot ulcers have increased in recent years. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is a novel adjuvant therapy that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for diabetic foot ulcers wounds. In this paper, the mechanisms of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for diabetic foot ulcers are described, including wound angiogenesis, wound tissue blood perfusion, nerve regeneration, granulation tissue proliferation, inflammatory response, anti-infection, migration and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells. This study aims to provide a theoretical basis for the clinical application of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in clinical treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most serious complications of diabetes mellitus. Considering complicated conditions, poor general condition, severe infection and poor outcomes as the feature characteristics of Chinese DFU patients, comprehensive and systematic evaluation, including general condition, region of the foot, and psychological status, is essential and fundamental for successful treatment. This commentary summarizes the evaluation contents in scientific and standardized diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcer, and looking forward to reducing morbidity, recurrence rate and mortality, and increasing limb salvage rate.
Diabetic foot ulcer is the most serious complication of diabetes. In addition to diabetic peripheral neuropathy and lower extremity vascular disease, diabetic foot pressure abnormality is an independent risk factor for diabetic foot ulcers. This review summarizes the relationship between plantar pressure and diabetes, including the concept of the plantar pressure and its measurement methods, as well as the abnormal changes in the plantar pressure of diabetic patients. In addition, through the explanation of the mechanism of diabetic patients’ plantar pressure changes, the methods of releasing the abnormal plantar pressure are discussed, so as to prevent and treat the diabetic foot ulcers, and improve our understanding of it.
ObjectiveTo investigate the epidemiological characteristics and predisposing causes of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) in the hospitalized patients with diabetic foot disease (DFD).MethodsThe clinical data of patients with DFD admitted to West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2018 were collected through the electronic medical record system. The demographic characteristics, blood glucose control status, and the predisposing causes of DFU were analyzed.ResultsA total of 1 022 DFD inpatients with an average age of (65.5±11.9) years old were included in this study, including 679 males and 343 females; 59.4% (513/864) of the patients had a college degree or above, but the patients with more severe DFD had lower educational level (χ2trend=19.554, P<0.001). The average time from diagnosis of diabetes mellitus to occurrence of DFD was (10.6±7.1) years, and 42.4% (433/1 022) of the patients had diabetes for over 10 years. Among the patients, 82.3% (841/1 022) treated diabetes irregularly, 56.2% (555/987) never monitored blood glucose, 51.2% (523/1 022) had a history of foot ulcers, and 8.6% (88/1 022) had a history of lower extremity or toe amputation. The average fasting blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c were (8.6±3.8) mmol/L and (8.2±2.1)%, respectively. There were 52.2% (525/1 006) and 94.4% (958/1 015) of the DFD patients companied with peripheral arterial disease and neuropathy, respectively. DFUs were mainly single (52.7%, 447/849) and neuro-ischemic ulcers (53.0%, 389/734). The main predisposing causes were physical causes (21.6%, 180/834) and trauma (19.2%, 160/834).ConclusionsThe patients with DFD have the characteristics of old age, long course of diabetes, irregular treatment of diabetes and poor control of blood glucose, combined with neurovascular diseases, and high recurrence rate of foot ulcer. Therefore, diabetes education, early screening of foot risk factors, and early intervention should be strengthened to prevent the occurrence and recurrence of DFU.
Objective To provide a clinical basis for the prevention of diabetic foot ulcers by analyzing the clinical data and prognosis of high-risk diabetic foot patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on high-risk diabetic foot patients who were hospitalized in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018. Patients were divided into high-risk group and low-risk group according to whether they hada history of foot ulcer or amputation. The clinical characteristics of the two groups of patients were compared. The patients were followed up from hospital discharge to January 31, 2021, and their survival and ulcer recurrence or new-onset status were evaluated. Results Finally, 123 patients were included, including 29 patients in the high-risk group and 94 patients in the low-risk group. There was no statistical difference in the duration of diabetes, smoking history, drinking history, education level, proportion of receiving regular treatment, proportion of regular blood glucose monitoring, body mass index, proportion of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, callus, foot deformity, diabetic nephropathy, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic cardiac autonomic neuropathy, diabetic gastrointestinal autonomic neuropathy, hypertension, coronary heart disease and laboratory test results between the two groups (P>0.05). The proportion of women (51.7% vs. 29.8%), age [(69.8±10.3) vs. (64.4±11.3) years], proportion of lower extremity arterial disease (62.1% vs. 34.4%), proportion of hyperuricemia (27.6% vs. 10.6%) in the high-risk group were higher than the low-risk group (P<0.05). After follow-up (67±20) months, 25.8% of the patients had ulcer recurrence or new onset, and 24.2% of the patients died. The most common cause of death was diabetes complications (43.8%). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative mortality rates of the patients were 4.5%, 12.7%, and 20.6%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year recurrence or new ulcer rates were 8.3% and 18.2%, respectively. The 5-year recurrence or new ulcer rates in the low-risk group and high-risk group were 10.3% and 40.3%, respectively, and there was a difference in ulcer recurrence between the two groups (P=0.004). Conclusions Compared with high-risk diabetic foot patients without ulcer or amputation, patients with a history of ulcer or amputation have higher rates of lower extremity arterial disease and hyperuricemia. Patients with a history of ulceration or amputation have a higher risk of recurrent or new ulceration than patients without a history of ulceration or amputation.