The radiology diagnosis report encapsulates radiologists’ comprehensive analytical insights and deep interpretive understanding of patients’ imaging data, serving as an essential basis for disease diagnosis, clinical treatment planning, and prognosis assessment. As the primary medium through which radiologists contribute substantively to patient’s care, traditional free-text reports represent subjective interpretations shaped by individual experience and stylistic preferences. Such reliance on personal factors can introduce inconsistencies and limitations in clinical applications. To address these challenges, structured radiology reporting has been developed. We present a concise overview of the origins, developmental trajectory, current landscape, and emerging trends of structured radiology reports, highlighting their role in advancing standardized.
In recent years, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been increasingly used for the treatment of peritoneal metastases. Imaging examination plays an important role in the process of CRS+HIPEC in treatment of peritoneal metastasis. This article briefly introduces the preoperative imaging evaluation, postoperative imaging evaluation, and current limitations of CRS+HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal metastases.
Acute pancreatitis is a prevalent acute abdominal syndrome in clinical practice, characterized by a complex and variable course, numerous complications, high treatment challenges, and significant variability in prognosis. Imaging computed tomography (CT) plays an indispensable role in the diagnosis, classification, and severity assessment of acute pancreatitis. To ensure precise communication of the condition across departments and mutual recognition of imaging examination results among different medical institutions, there is an urgent need to establish standardized imaging reports for acute pancreatitis. We present the CT structured reporting for acute pancreatitis utilized at West China Hospital of Sichuan University, with the aim of promoting the standardization of CT report writing for acute pancreatitis.
ObjectiveTo summarize the common imaging features of liver cancer after local-regional therapy in order to more accurately evaluate the post-treatment response of it. MethodThe literatures of studies on imaging features after ablation, transcatheter therapy, and radiotherapy of liver cancer in recent years were searched and reviewed. ResultsIt was not accurate to evaluate the response of liver cancer after treatment only by comparing the size of tumor before and after treatment. We should follow up and observe the changes of enhancement components after tumor treatment, and pay attention to identify the normal features after treatment. ConclusionsImaging evaluation after local-regional therapy of liver cancer is of great significance in management and clinical decision-making of patients with liver cancer. Standard response evaluation systems such as EASL or mRECIST should be carefully applied after local-regional therapy of liver cancer. Treatment response of patients should be comprehensively evaluated in combination with the characteristics of local-regional therapy methods and timing, so as to avoid delaying timing of secondary treatment and causing excessive treatment.
Objective To evaluate the sensitivity， specificity, and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging （MRI） in characterizing adnexal masses. Methods The databases such as the Cochrane Library, PubMed， EMbase， CNKI， and WanFang Data were searched on computer from 1991 to 2011. The reviewers screened the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria strictly, extracted the data， and assessed the methodology quality. Meta-analysis were performed using the Metadisc 1.40 software. The acquired pooled sensitivity, specificity， and summary receiver operating characteristic curve （SROC） were used to describe the diagnostic value. The pooled likelihood ratios were calculated based on the pooled sensitivity and specificity. Results Ten case-control studies involving 649 women who were suspected to have pelvic masses were included and 729 masses were confirmed by the postoperative histopathology. The pooled statistical results of meta-analysis showed that：the sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 〔89%（84%-92%）， P=0.046 6〕 and 〔87% （83%-90%）， P=0.000 2〕 respectively, the positive and negative likelihood ratios of MRI were 6.25（P=0.008 5） and 0.14（P=0.029 1） respectively, and the area under the SROC curve （AUC） was 0.941. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound were 〔87%（82%-91%）， P=0.000 0〕 and 〔73%（69%-77%）, P=0.000 0〕 respectively, the positive and negative likelihood ratios of MRI were 3.07（P=0.000 0） and 0.18（P=0.000 1） respectively， and the AUC was 0.897. The speci?city and accuracy of MRI in characterizing female pelvic masses were higher than ultrasound obviously. Conclusion According these evidences， the MRI should be recommended to the women who are suspected to have pelvic masses as a preferred.