【Abstract】 Objective To construct tissue engineered skeletal muscle in vivo using glial cell derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) genetically modified myoblast (Mb) on acellular collagen sponge with hypoglossal nerve implantation, and to observe whether structural or functional connection could be established between engineered tissue and motor nerve or not. Methods Mbs were isolated from 7 male Lewis rats at age of 2 days, cultured and genetically modified by recombinant adenovirus carrying GDNF cDNA (MbGDNF). Calf skin-derived acellular collagen sponge was used as scaffold; cell adhesion was detected by scanning electron microscope after 24 hours. Hypoglossal nerve was implanted into Mb-scaffold complex (Mb group, n=27) or MbGDNF-scaffold complex (MbGDNF group, n=27) in 54 female Lewis rats at age of 8 weeks. HE staining was performed at 1, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively, and immunohistochemistry staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization were used. Results MbGDNF could highly expressed GDNF gene. Mb and MbGDNF could adhere to the scaffold and grew well. HE staining showed tight junctions between implant and peripheral tissue with new muscle fiber and no distinguished line at 12 weeks in 2 groups. Immunohistochemistry staining showed that positive cells of myogenin and slow skeletal myosin were detected, as well as positive cells of actylcholine receptor α1 at 1, 6, and 12 weeks. The positive cells of Y chromosome decreased with time. At 1, 6, and 12 weeks, the positive neurons were 261.0 ± 6.6, 227.3 ± 8.5, and 173.3 ± 9.1, respectively in MbGDNF group, and were 234.7 ± 5.5, 196.0 ± 13.5, and 166.7 ± 11.7, respectively in Mb group; significant differences were found between 2 groups at 1 and 6 weeks (P lt; 0.05), no significant difference at 12 weeks (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Connection can be established between engineered tissue and implanted hypoglossal nerve. Recombinant GDNF produced by MbGDNF might play a critical role in protecting central motor neurons from apoptosis by means of retrograde transportation.
The planning and reporting of synthesis questions in systematic review of intervention have a direct and important impact on the validity of the evaluation and the credibility of the results. Planning helps to reduce bias in the evaluation process and ensure the reproducibility of data synthesis. However, the field of systematic review currently lacks specific checklists and tools to guide how to plan and report these issues. The InSynQ (Intervention Synthesis Questions) checklist is a tool designed for planning and reporting data synthesis issues in systematic reviews of interventions. Its goal is to promote the standardization of systematic review methods, support systematic review participants in planning and comprehensively reporting data synthesis issues and structures, and provide a more accurate evidence base for clinical decision-making.