ObjectiveTo prospectively study the effect of preventing postoperative reflux esophagitis with esophagogastrostomy and RouxenY gastrojejunostomy after proximal subtotal gastrectomy.MethodsTwentysix cases of carcinoma of the gastric fundus and cardia were allocated randomly to 2 groups (the control group with 12 cases and the experimental group with 14 cases) according to odd or even number of the admission number.After proximal subtotal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy, the control group underwent pyloroplasty while the experimental group with pyloruspreserving RouxenY gastrojejunostomy.The inflammatory reaction of the tissue obtained at the esophagogastric junction using a fiber gastroscope was observed after half year of postoperative followup in the two groups.An examination of gastric emptying of a radionuclidelabeled test meal were performed.According to the Visick score of followup data,the effects of operation were evaluated.The 5year survival rate was also evaluated.ResultsThe postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms in the experimental group were slighter than those in the control group.The examination of gastric emptying of a radionuclidelabeled test meal showed that the gastric emptying time of a half dose,gastric remains rates of radionuclide after 10 min and 60 min in the experimental group were similar to those in the control healthy people group.But in the control group,the gastric emptying time of a half dose delayed,and the gastric remains rate of radionuclide after 10 min and 60 min were higher than the other groups.The biopsy study of the esophagogastric junction showed that the inflammatory reaction in the experimental group was slighter than that in the control group.There was no significant difference between the two groups in the survival rate.ConclusionFor patients with carcinoma of the gastric fundus and cardia, after proximal subtotal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy,compared with pyloroplasty,pyloruspreserving RouxenY gastrojejunostomy can decrease the reflux esophagitis,and relieve the postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (dmPJ) and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy (iPJ) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) on postoperative outcomes. MethodsPubmed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Wanfang and CNKI database were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating different type of pancreaticojejunostomy during PD. The literatures were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessment was conducted according to Jadad scoring system. ResultsNine RCTs were included, 1 032 patients were recruited, including 510 patients in dmPJ group and 522 patients in iPJ group. Meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the incidence of pancreatic fistula in total (OR=0.95, P=0.78), clinical relevant pancreatic fistula (OR=0.78, P=0.71), overall morbidity (OR=0.93, P=0.60), perioperative mortality (OR=0.86, P=0.71), reoperation rate (OR=1.18, P=0.59), and length of hospital stay (WMD=-1.11, P=0.19). ConclusionDmPJ and iPJ are comparable in terms of pancreatic fistula and other complications.
Objective To investigate the effect of the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in invaginating end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy. Methods A retrospective review was conducted for 200 patients treated with pancreaticoduod-enectomy （PD） between August 2005 and December 2012. Reconstruction of digestive tract in PD was done according to the method described by Child. The duct-to-mucosa anastomosis was applied in the invaginating end-to-side pancrea-ticojejunostomy. The outline of the anastomosis structures was as follows：anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa， anastomosis of pancreatic and jejunal resection margin， and anastomosis of pancreas and jejunal seromuscular layer. A cilicone tube was put into the pancreatic duct and lead to the jejunum. The anastomotic stoma was covered with part of the omentum majus, and put a drainage tube under the anastomotic stoma. Results The operation went smoothly，and no deaths occurred during perioperative period. The surgical time was 280-420 min， the average time was （298±77） min. The pancreatic fistula were observed in 22 patients （11%）， including 17 patients in Grade A， 2 patients in Grade B， and 3 patients in Grade C. The other complications were observed in 19 patients， including 16 patients with addominal infection， 1 patient with bleeding from splenic vein， 1 patient with bleeding from ruptured of pseudoaneurysm at biliary intestinal anastomosis， 1 patient with abdominal abscess. Three patients with pancreatic fistula in Grade C were cured by reoperation, and the other patients with pancreatic fistula were cured by expectant treatment. Conclusions The duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in invaginating end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy is a simple and safe procedure that has the advantage in reducing the incidence of the pancreatic fistula. Using omentum to cover the anastomotic could localize the diffusion of panreactic fistula， and reduce the incidence of serious complications caused by pancreatic fistula.
Objective To investigate the risk factors of infection after radiofrequency ablation in patients with liver metastases after choledochojejunostomy. Methods The clinical data of patients with liver metastases treated by radiofrequency ablation in our hospital from January 2010 to April 2022 were collected retrospectively and analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 57 patients were included in the study, and the total number of postoperative infections was 19 (33.33%). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the tumor location, maximum tumor diameter, number of tumors, ablation times, and ablation duration were related to the occurrence of infection after radiofrequency ablation (P<0.01). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the tumor location [OR=6.45, 95%CI (1.11, 37.35), P=0.037] and ablation duration [OR=1.49, 95%CI (1.16, 1.91), P=0.002] were independent risk factors for infection after radiofrequency ablation in patients with choledocho-jejunostomy. Conclusions For patients with metastatic liver cancer with a history of choledochojejunostomy, the tumor location and the duration of ablation are closely related to postoperative infection. We should strengthen the indivi-dualized management of such patients during and after operation should be strengthened to promote disease recovery.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety in the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction between gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement.MethodsThe relevant literatures of efficacy and safety of GJ and SEMS placement in the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction were searched in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trial, VIP, CNKI, Wanfang Data databases. The data were extracted and evaluated by the RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 articles with 1 505 patients were included, of which 620 underwent the GJ (GJ group) and 885 underwent the SEMS placement (SEMS group); 3 RCTs, 9 non-RCTs. The meta-analysis results showed: the length of hospital stay [MD=5.83, 95%CI (4.24, 7.42), P<0.000 01] and time of postoperative recovery diet [MD=3.41, 95%CI (1.79, 5.03), P<0.000 1] of the SEMS group were significantly shorter than those of the GJ group; Although the incidence of complications of the GJ group was significantly higher than that of the SEMS group [OR=1.85, 95%CI (1.27, 2.70), P=0.001], the technical success rate [OR=2.72, 95%CI (1.13, 6.53), P=0.03] and clinical success rate [OR=1.86, 95%CI (1.35, 2.57), P=0.000 2] were higher and the survival time was longer [MD=38.31, 95%CI (28.98, 47.64), P<0.000 01] of the GJ group as compared with the SEMS group.ConclusionsSEMS placement is more effective in recovering dietary capacity, length of hospital stay, and incidence of complications, while GJ is more effective in survival time, technical success rate, and clinical success rate. In clinical practice, we could choose different surgical method according to patient situation.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of antecolic duodenojejunostomy (ADJ) and retrocolic duodenojejunostomy (RDJ) after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADJ versus RDJ after PPPD were searched in Cochrane Library, PubMed database, Embase database, Web of Science, Chinese biomedicine database, CNKI database, VIP database, and Wanfang database from inception to April 2014, as well as Google. After quality assessment of RCTs according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version, Meta analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsFour RCTs of 462 patients in total were included in this Meta-analysis. The results of Meta-analysis showed that, there were no significant differences in the operation time (MD=14.02, 95% CI:-41.42-69.46, P=0.62), incidence of postoperative complications (RR=1.09, 95% CI:0.81-1.48, P=0.56), incidence of delayed gastric emptying (RR=0.63, 95% CI:0.31-1.28, P=0.20), incidence of pancreatic fistula (RR=1.13, 95% CI:0.72-1.75, P=0.60), incidence of abdominal abscess (RR=0.92, 95% CI:0.54-1.58, P=0.77), and mortality (RR=0.61, 95% CI:0.24-1.60, P=0.32) between ADJ group and RDJ group. ConclusionsThe effectiveness of ADJ is similar with RDJ after PPPD, so the reconstruction way after PPPD can be routed according to the surgeon's preference.
Objective To compare anastomotic fistula of modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods The clinical data of 147 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2015 to June 2017 in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively analyzed. The modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 101 cases (MTL group) and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 46 cases (IPJ group). The differences of intraoperative and postoperative statuses were compared between the two groups. Results The baseline data of these two groups had no significant differences (P>0.05). Except for the average time of the pancreaticoenterostomy of the MTL group was significantly longer than that of the IPJ group (P<0.05), the intraoperative blood loss, the first postoperative exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization time, reoperation rate, death rate, and rates of complications such as the pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, anastomotic bleeding, gastric emptying disorder, and intraperitoneal infection had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Both modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy are safe and effective. An individualized selection should be adopted according to specific situation of patient.
ObjectiveTo investigate the application of imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy in pure laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsEighty-five cases of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from May 2014 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According with inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, 78 cases were investigated. They were divided into pancreatic duct-to-jejunum mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy group as controlled group (n=42) and imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy (technique of duct-to-mucosa PJ with transpancreatic interlocking mattress sutures) group as modified group (n=36). The rates of pancreatic fistula, abdominal infection/abscess, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal/intraabdominal hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, and incision infection were investigated as well as hospital stays and pancreaticojejunostomy time in two groups were compared. ResultsThe rate of pancreatic fistula especially B to C grade pancreatic fistula in the modified group was obviously lower compared with which in the controlled group (8.3% vs. 31.0%, P < 0.05), pancreaticojejunostomy time ofmodified group was significantly shortened [(35.6±12.4) min vs. (52.8±24.6) min, P < 0.05] and total operative time also shortened [(322.4±23.6) min vs. (384.2±30.2) min, P < 0.05). There were no significant difference of the rates of abdominal infection/abscess, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal/intraabdominal hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, ?incision infection, and hospital stays (P > 0.05)]. Conciusions The type of pancreaticojejunostomy has a significant impact on the rate of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy can decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after operation, and shorten the pancreaticojejunostomy time and total operative time.
Objective To evaluate the linkage between the proxmal as well as long term outcome and choice of therapeutical modality for benign hilar stricture of bile duct prospectively. Methods 25 patients have been catergorized into 4 groups according to different pathogen and the proxmal as well as long term outcome after pathogen based management have been studied prospectively. Results The hepatic portal cholangio-jejunostomy applied for iatrogenic hilar stricture of bile duct has been proved to be effective and the incidence of refulux cholangitis is only 10%(1/10). Hepatic hilar plasty procedures keep the physiological entitity of bile duct and the vital, sufficient autologous repair materials as well as reliable operation design are needed. Resection of atrophic right liver lobe bearing hepatolithiasis combined hepatic hilar plasty has reached both elimination of liver focus and maintaining the physiological entitity of bile duct. The ballon dilation for mild ring-like hilar stricture of bile duct is valide but not for hilar tubular stricture of secondary sclerosing cholangitis.Conclusion The strategy of individualized management (pathogen based management) for benign hilar stricture of bile duct has proved to be reliable and effective.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic magnetic compression cholangiojejunostomy (LMCCJ) with laparoscopic hand-sutured cholangiojejunostomy (LHSCJ). MethodsA retrospective case-control study was performed. From January 2019 to May 2022, 37 patients, who underwent laparoscopic treatment in this hospital, were enrolled in this study. There were 16 cases in the LMCCJ group and 21 cases in the LHSCJ group. The demographic information, procedure time to complete bilioenteric reconstruction, postoperative hospital stay, operative complications, magnets expulsion time, and follow-up results were collected and analyzed. ResultsThere were no statistical differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, composition of primary diseases, preoperative total bilirubin, and preoperative common bile duct diameter between the two groups (P＞0.05). The outer diameter of the magnets was (10.50±0.97) mm, the expulsion time of the magnets was (49.69±37.58) d, and the expulsion rate of the magnets was 100% (16/16). There was no intestinal obstruction or gastrointestinal perforation caused by the retention of the magnets. The procedure time to complete bilioenteric reconstruction in the LMCCJ group was statistically shorter than that in the LHSCJ group [(11.31±3.40) min vs. (24.81±3.40) min, t=11.96, P＜0.01]. There was no statistical difference in the total bilirubin level at the first week after surgery between the two groups (U=142.0, P=0.80). The postoperative hospital stay in the LMCCJ group was longer than that in the LHSCJ group [(28.31±14.11) d vs. (16.19±7.56) d, t=3.36, P＜0.01]. During the perioperative period, there was no bleeding or biliary infection in the two groups, but one case of biliary leak in the LHSCJ group. In all 37 patients were followed-up for (548.8±259.2) d. During the follow-up period, the incidence rates of biliary intestinal anastomosis stenosis, tumor recurrence, and mortality had no statistical differences between the two groups (P＞0.05). ConclusionFrom the results of comparative analysis in this study, it can be concluded that LMCCJ is not only safe equally, but also easier and less time-consuming as compared with LHSCJ.